This is my 1st time repairing a Stude front end.
I have a 65 Cruiser and one lower outer threaded "A" arm joint is tight. I suspect a PO may have over-torqued the threaded bushes in an attempt to overcome worn parts as the ears on the "A" arm and in the process has deformed the ears and causing the threaded bushes to bind on the threaded shaft. I have found that the measurement between the pads is supposed to be 2.750". I have pressed the ears out square and they are closer to 2.710" This is about the same as on another old spare arm I have. Other side arm is 2.750.
After clean up I find there is a fair amount of play between threaded bushes and shaft; but when it was assembled was tight; most likely from the distorted "A" arm ears.
On new assemblies how snug are the threaded bushes on the shaft? Is there any looseness in the threads before assembly? I am trying to work out if I have a worn unit that needs replacement and have never checked a new unit for comparison.
Ken
I have a 65 Cruiser and one lower outer threaded "A" arm joint is tight. I suspect a PO may have over-torqued the threaded bushes in an attempt to overcome worn parts as the ears on the "A" arm and in the process has deformed the ears and causing the threaded bushes to bind on the threaded shaft. I have found that the measurement between the pads is supposed to be 2.750". I have pressed the ears out square and they are closer to 2.710" This is about the same as on another old spare arm I have. Other side arm is 2.750.
After clean up I find there is a fair amount of play between threaded bushes and shaft; but when it was assembled was tight; most likely from the distorted "A" arm ears.
On new assemblies how snug are the threaded bushes on the shaft? Is there any looseness in the threads before assembly? I am trying to work out if I have a worn unit that needs replacement and have never checked a new unit for comparison.
Ken
Comment