Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

700R4/4l60E Automatic Question

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    quote:Originally posted by sbca96

    I think that the reason no one has come up with this replacement, is
    there isnt a real advantage to doing it. I can see modding the upper
    arm, but to replace everything just to get disc brakes doesnt make any
    sense to me. There are two widely used disc brake options available
    on the market, and my setup which is lessor known and still relatively
    new. I have only two sold, and one has been installed.

    What would be useful is a power box to replace the rather complicated
    Stude power steering system. Replacing the whole suspension just to
    get ball joints is kinda a step back. Granted ball joints are normal
    use these days, kingpins are considerably stronger and controled. Its
    not, in itself, the problem. Perhaps once we hear of a successful
    install of a Phantom front suspension, we will all eat crow?

    Tom
    Why I prefer ball joints over kingpins on an IFS is fewer moving parts and much easier serviceability.

    In all fairness: modern ball joints are quite tough.

    I very much agree about your thoughts one a decent PS system though.


    Things happen for a reason
    --------------------------------------

    Sold my 1962; Studeless at the moment

    Borrowed Bams50's sigline here:

    "Do they all not, by mere virtue of having survived as relics of a bygone era, amass a level of respect perhaps not accorded to them when they were new?"

    Comment

    Working...
    X