Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

R3 intake and exhaust manifold questions

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Lighten up on Stone. He was the wallet. He never made anything himself. He had others build stuff for him and had no quality control. I built all his oil pans for 37 years. One time I asked him, "Don't you put names on these pans so you know who they go back to, I would be pissed if I sent you a pan that was straight and perfect and got back some junk like you give me to work on." He never looked at or inspected the parts I made, just threw them in the back of his truck and split. I welded up the first few R3 manifolds for him that he converted to the smaller R1-2 port size. I told him that he should get new core boxes made rather than weld, since I did not like the neck down of the port. You can not get a tig torch too far down into the port to do it right. On the iron R3 manifolds, I have seen one at Paxton in 66 or 67. Joe G. tried to sell it to me along with a a pair of R3 heads. I told him I wanted an aluminum one and it was $160 more.

    Comment


    • #17
      Thank the lord for Jon Myer!!
      Originally posted by Alan View Post
      Lighten up on Stone. He was the wallet. He never made anything himself. He had others build stuff for him and had no quality control. I built all his oil pans for 37 years. One time I asked him, "Don't you put names on these pans so you know who they go back to, I would be pissed if I sent you a pan that was straight and perfect and got back some junk like you give me to work on." He never looked at or inspected the parts I made, just threw them in the back of his truck and split. I welded up the first few R3 manifolds for him that he converted to the smaller R1-2 port size. I told him that he should get new core boxes made rather than weld, since I did not like the neck down of the port. You can not get a tig torch too far down into the port to do it right. On the iron R3 manifolds, I have seen one at Paxton in 66 or 67. Joe G. tried to sell it to me along with a a pair of R3 heads. I told him I wanted an aluminum one and it was $160 more.

      Comment


      • #18
        Who is selling "corrected" R-3 intakes to fit standard R-1 heads??

        Comment


        • #19
          Originally posted by Hawklover View Post
          Who is selling "corrected" R-3 intakes to fit standard R-1 heads??
          AFAIK, no one is at present offering those. Supposedly, John Erb bought the patterns from Lionel Stone, but he hasn't put them back into production.

          jack vines
          PackardV8

          Comment


          • #20
            Many thanks for the update Jack.
            Originally posted by PackardV8 View Post
            AFAIK, no one is at present offering those. Supposedly, John Erb bought the patterns from Lionel Stone, but he hasn't put them back into production.

            jack vines

            Comment


            • #21
              Lionel Stone's performance parts

              Originally posted by Alan View Post
              Lighten up on Stone. He was the wallet. He never made anything himself. He had others build stuff for him and had no quality control.
              Lionel Stone was responsible for the final product, whether he did any of the work or not. There is no other position that is defensible.
              -Dwight

              Comment


              • #22
                Originally posted by Dwight FitzSimons View Post
                Lionel Stone was responsible for the final product, whether he did any of the work or not. There is no other position that is defensible. -Dwight
                Agree, Dwight, but Alan is also right. While Lionel Stone (and Dick Datson) had their considerable shortcomings, we all owe them a debt of gratitude. They were leaders in keeping Studebaker performance alive in the dark days when few others bothered to offer anything.

                jack vines
                PackardV8

                Comment


                • #23
                  Originally posted by PackardV8 View Post
                  Agree, Dwight, but Alan is also right. While Lionel Stone (and Dick Datson) had their considerable shortcomings, we all owe them a debt of gratitude. They were leaders in keeping Studebaker performance alive in the dark days when few others bothered to offer anything.

                  jack vines
                  Maybe. Lionel's catalog was to many of us like the lingerie section of the Sears catalog is to a teenage boy. But, the reality was like the teenage boy peeling off the lingerie and finding a plastic mannequin. I would be curious what percentage of Lionel's parts failed or required considerable rework. If a worthwhile percentage of his parts worked then he performed a worthwhile service. For me, his oil pumps went 0 for 2, and catastrophically so, therefore no debt of gratitude from me. I'm not a person who holds grudges, however, just putting my 2 cents worth toward setting the record straight.
                  -Dwight

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Originally posted by Dwight FitzSimons View Post
                    Maybe. For me, his oil pumps went 0 for 2, and catastrophically so, therefore no debt of gratitude from me.
                    Getting OT, but for the good of the order, what was the failure mode on his R3 pumps? Were they repops or rebuilds?

                    jack vines
                    PackardV8

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Originally posted by PackardV8 View Post
                      Getting OT, but for the good of the order, what was the failure mode on his R3 pumps? Were they repops or rebuilds?

                      jack vines
                      Both oil pumps were high volume (R3-R4) repops, which have 0.5"-longer gears (& 0.5"-longer housings). The first pump locked up as soon as the newly rebuilt engine warmed up on its first test drive. There was insufficient clearance between the gears and the end plate to account for thermal expansion of the gears. The gears are steel and the housing is cast iron. Expansion rates with temperature are much higher for steel than for cast iron, so that clearance is essential (as laid out in the Avanti Shop Manual). The second pump was checked fully for these clearances, but no one noticed that Lionel's machinist had used a regular housing instead of the 0.5"-longer R3-R4 housing. The machinist had machined 0.5" deeper for the longer gears. This made the cast iron too thin and the housing simply broke in two.
                      -Dwight

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        Click image for larger version

Name:	dual quads.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	105.9 KB
ID:	1723499Had to chime in as I just picked up a complete running 365 CI Cadillac w/dual quads, thinking maybe studillac........

                        Comment

                        Working...
                        X