Hey folks, I have posted regarding this subject before. It has been some time. Instead of digging up an old thread, and having to wade through old posts that don't address my current concerns, I thought I'd start a new thread. Last week, I drove up to Virginia and picked up this 232 V8 from Pete Rutledge (R Pete here on the forum). Besides having a fun "road-trip," I had a great time meeting Pete, his lovely wife, and got to see his pristine '53, and '57 Corvettes that share garage space with his '54 Studebaker Coupe.
Pete helped me load the engine in the back of my truck. Upon returning home, "off loading" it was not so quick or easy. Anyway, I managed to get it off my truck and onto one of those small Harbor Freight/Northern Tool light duty utility trailer frames. I have used this little trailer as a base for an engine test stand in the past. Previously, I had a flat head six installed, complete with a radiator, gauges, so that I could run the engine. For "tinkering" fun, that arrangement worked out pretty good.
Since then, I removed the six cylinder engine. I installed two "C" channel rails and mounted an engine stand on the trailer. You know the kind, "Engine Stand" where you bolt the engine block for disassembly/reassembly. That is quite different than an "Engine Test Stand," where you mount an assembled engine, complete, in a manner that it can be run, tuned, etc. before transferring it into a vehicle. So, now I have removed that engine and stand, and placed this 232 V8 on a temporary wooden pallet until I can fabricate a metal cradle assembly to make it a true "Test Stand."
Here comes my question(s)...What would you consider the ideal working height? How 'bout motor mounts? My plan is to weld up some kind of motor mounts that can slide front to back between those "C" channel rails. The reason for that is that I intend to mount the bellhousing and transmission on the engine at some point. I would like to adjust the entire assembly over the axle to maintain weight distribution balance. For example, currently, the engine with no flywheel, is pretty well balanced slightly forward of the wheels on the temporary wooden cradle it sits in. If I began installing a flywheel, clutch, pressure plate, bellhousing, Transmission...the trailer would flip backwards. So...I need to make it adjustable front to back. In addition to working height, I also want to build the test stand where I can remove and replace the oil pan "in place." That means the oil pan will have to clear the oil pump pick-up tube and filter screen assembly.
Some of the engine transmission assemblies use two motor mount points on the front, and the rear is either on the bellhousing, or transmission...thus, a three point mounting system. Since I plan to use the engine in a truck, I notice that my "parts truck" engine is a "four point" mounting system, with two engine mounts up front and two in the rear.
So...those of you with engine test stands, what are your working heights? If you could change what you have now, what would you like to change? If you have pictures, share them. Right now, I'm in the "thinking it through" stage. I plan to install factory engine mounts, and cut and weld angle iron, perhaps square tubing, to get me from the "C" channel rails up to the engine mounts. Getting the assemblies to be a practical working height, sufficient strength, and oriented to be out of the way for access...is the challenge.
Pete helped me load the engine in the back of my truck. Upon returning home, "off loading" it was not so quick or easy. Anyway, I managed to get it off my truck and onto one of those small Harbor Freight/Northern Tool light duty utility trailer frames. I have used this little trailer as a base for an engine test stand in the past. Previously, I had a flat head six installed, complete with a radiator, gauges, so that I could run the engine. For "tinkering" fun, that arrangement worked out pretty good.
Since then, I removed the six cylinder engine. I installed two "C" channel rails and mounted an engine stand on the trailer. You know the kind, "Engine Stand" where you bolt the engine block for disassembly/reassembly. That is quite different than an "Engine Test Stand," where you mount an assembled engine, complete, in a manner that it can be run, tuned, etc. before transferring it into a vehicle. So, now I have removed that engine and stand, and placed this 232 V8 on a temporary wooden pallet until I can fabricate a metal cradle assembly to make it a true "Test Stand."
Here comes my question(s)...What would you consider the ideal working height? How 'bout motor mounts? My plan is to weld up some kind of motor mounts that can slide front to back between those "C" channel rails. The reason for that is that I intend to mount the bellhousing and transmission on the engine at some point. I would like to adjust the entire assembly over the axle to maintain weight distribution balance. For example, currently, the engine with no flywheel, is pretty well balanced slightly forward of the wheels on the temporary wooden cradle it sits in. If I began installing a flywheel, clutch, pressure plate, bellhousing, Transmission...the trailer would flip backwards. So...I need to make it adjustable front to back. In addition to working height, I also want to build the test stand where I can remove and replace the oil pan "in place." That means the oil pan will have to clear the oil pump pick-up tube and filter screen assembly.
Some of the engine transmission assemblies use two motor mount points on the front, and the rear is either on the bellhousing, or transmission...thus, a three point mounting system. Since I plan to use the engine in a truck, I notice that my "parts truck" engine is a "four point" mounting system, with two engine mounts up front and two in the rear.
So...those of you with engine test stands, what are your working heights? If you could change what you have now, what would you like to change? If you have pictures, share them. Right now, I'm in the "thinking it through" stage. I plan to install factory engine mounts, and cut and weld angle iron, perhaps square tubing, to get me from the "C" channel rails up to the engine mounts. Getting the assemblies to be a practical working height, sufficient strength, and oriented to be out of the way for access...is the challenge.
Comment