Just to prove how "old-school," (or probably more "out of touch") and how time has passed me by...when I started this thread, I was thinking in terms of what contemporary engines are available from wrecking yards, (junk yards, scrap yards, salvage yards) that are lighter, economical, and more efficient? What contemporary engine would be available in sufficient numbers for re-planting in the way the SBC (which my mind narrows to the traditional 283/327/350 carb versions.)
Like dandelions on the roadside...these SBC engines were so plentiful, that good versions were often transplanted directly to new homes without internal modifications. An entire industry developed to provide adapters, dress-up, and performance enhancers for those wanting more "umph" in power. I'm not so sure that it is the greatness of the engine, as much as it was the quantity or availability. Being so plentiful, to me, it seems to be the old "path of least resistance" rule. There are other terrific engines by Ford, Chrysler, and imports, but as of yet, nothing with the cottage industry support of the SBC.
One other comment...I have no particular "facts" to support...but have the impression that Ford attempts to suppress aftermarket industries from making things for their brand unless they sanction and get a piece of the action. I have also been given the impression, that GM is not so sensitive or involved in those offering aftermarket items. Again...I have developed this as only an "opinion/impression" from years of casual shadetree conversations at cruise-in/car show and parts store visits. I wanted to make this "disclaimer" because of all us Studebaker folks know...those Studebaker cars being made in Canada, are sporting 289 engines stolen from vintage Mustangs in the U.S.
My "old-fashioned" frame of reference comes from the "junk-yard" era...before there was even a concept of "Crate Engine." Perhaps, the SBC phenomenon is one of those historical events that occur once, flourish, and subside as advances in technology pass them by. (Like steam locomotives)
Like dandelions on the roadside...these SBC engines were so plentiful, that good versions were often transplanted directly to new homes without internal modifications. An entire industry developed to provide adapters, dress-up, and performance enhancers for those wanting more "umph" in power. I'm not so sure that it is the greatness of the engine, as much as it was the quantity or availability. Being so plentiful, to me, it seems to be the old "path of least resistance" rule. There are other terrific engines by Ford, Chrysler, and imports, but as of yet, nothing with the cottage industry support of the SBC.
One other comment...I have no particular "facts" to support...but have the impression that Ford attempts to suppress aftermarket industries from making things for their brand unless they sanction and get a piece of the action. I have also been given the impression, that GM is not so sensitive or involved in those offering aftermarket items. Again...I have developed this as only an "opinion/impression" from years of casual shadetree conversations at cruise-in/car show and parts store visits. I wanted to make this "disclaimer" because of all us Studebaker folks know...those Studebaker cars being made in Canada, are sporting 289 engines stolen from vintage Mustangs in the U.S.

My "old-fashioned" frame of reference comes from the "junk-yard" era...before there was even a concept of "Crate Engine." Perhaps, the SBC phenomenon is one of those historical events that occur once, flourish, and subside as advances in technology pass them by. (Like steam locomotives)

Comment