Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Studebaker/Packard history for the newbies

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Studebaker/Packard history for the newbies

    Copied from a Facebook page:

    This week in 1952 marked the beginning of the end for Packard for this week's 'Sales Ad Saturday’. Jim Nance was elected President of Packard on May 8th, 1952. Nance was charismatic, driven, and considered a highly competent and well-respected executive, who had earned a solid reputation with his previous work as Vice President at Zenith radio, and CEO of GE’s Hotpoint division.

    Packard had tried to hit the ground running after the war, but its immediate offering was little more than a warmed-over continuation of its tired 1942 Clipper models for both ’45 and ’46. Sales picked up dramatically in ’48 when Packard nearly doubled production with the introduction of the controversial and unfairly derided 22nd series “Bathtub” Packards. It was not an easy time; the company had been having trouble acquiring steel, running in the red, and spending lots of money preparing production infrastructure for planned annual production of 200,000 cars, a goal set by then-President George Christopher which the company never came close to achieving. By ’49, Christopher was out, replaced for a few years by Hugh Ferry until Ferry selected Nance to assume his role, while Ferry became Chairman of the Board. Under Ferry’s leadership, the company introduced the uninspired 24th series Packards in March of ’51 but also introduced the stylish Pan American concept car, which was soon developed into the iconic Caribbean when introduced in ’53. When he took over, Nance wasted no time making lots of organizational changes internally. Forced retirements of many older company executives and the recruitment of lots of younger talent were aimed to develop a more youthful corporate culture. One of those youthful hires was a young engineer named John DeLorean, who stayed with Packard for 4 years.

    Nance’s first full year was fairly successful, with Packard selling over 90,000 cars. The company would never come close to those sales levels again. A credit crunch in ’54 hurt most automakers, but Packard sales fell particularly hard, down 65% compared to 1953, with just over 31,000 cars sold. Things picked up a little in 1955, with a fresh new design known internally as the “First Series”, which found 55,000 buyers. Unfortunately, the development of these cars was rushed and badly mismanaged. While the new cars were quite advanced for their time, they were plagued with a variety of issues not properly sorted out before production began. The first series damaged Packard’s image, and Packard spent tens of millions of dollars fixing customer's cars.

    Nance believed the key to successfully taking on the Big Three was the consolidation of the independents. Not long after taking over, he and executives from other companies began initial discussions to consolidate the four automakers; Packard, Nash, Hudson, and Studebaker into one company, better poised to compete in the market. Nash and Hudson completed a merger of their own, forming American Motors in May of ‘54. In July of ’54, Packard and Studebaker made the regrettable and hasty decision to merge as well. Shortly after, initial discussions were underway for a merger of the two companies; American Motors and Studebaker-Packard, but for a variety of reasons, including a rejected demand that Nance would be President of the new conglomerate, a deal never materialized. Nance remained President of the new Studebaker-Packard corporation while Studebaker’s Paul Hoffman became Chairman. Although Studebaker had consistently sold more cars annually than Packard, Studebaker was in terrible financial shape. Poorly managed and hemorrhaging cash, something Packard would not fully realize until after the deal was finalized, the company was in desperate need of Packard’s rapidly diminishing capital, much of which had been borrowed by Nance that year. In less than two years time, Packard was in deep trouble as the failures of the ’55 Packards kept prospective buyers away in ’56. Packard sales plummeted to just over 28,000 cars, which were the last of the ‘real Packards’.

    With the financial deadweight of Studebaker hanging over him, Nance found that no bank would consider any further financing when Packard practically ran out of cash in 1956. A Senate inquiry into Packard’s financial situation that year found issues with government manufacturing contracts that had been taken from the automaker and given to GM instead. Nance resigned under pressure, and not long after he did, Studebaker management entered into a three-year management agreement with Curtiss-Wright. With the agreement, Studebaker received the operating capital it needed to continue, while the hugely profitable Curtiss-Wright enjoyed a hefty tax write-off from the losses of the two companies. That agreement led to the plundering of Packard. Curtiss-Wright sold the Packard plant in Detroit, took over Packard’s Utica engine plant for their own operations, and sold Packard’s proving grounds to Ford. What little remained of Packard's operations were moved to Studebaker in South Bend, and the Packards for ’57 and ’58 were little more than re-badged Studebakers. Sales amounted to no more than 5,543 cars in ’57 and a scant 1,745 for ’58 when the last of the “Packardbakers” rolled off the line- a quiet end to one of the most prestigious American automakers in history.
    Proud NON-CASO

    I do not prize the word "cheap." It is not a badge of honor...it is a symbol of despair. ~ William McKinley

    If it is decreed that I should go down, then let me go down linked with the truth - let me die in the advocacy of what is just and right.- Lincoln

    GOD BLESS AMERICA

    Ephesians 6:10-17
    Romans 15:13
    Deuteronomy 31:6
    Proverbs 28:1

    Illegitimi non carborundum

  • #2
    Interesting. Did this facebook article give any credit or resources that were cited for the article? It appears to have lots of opinions being represented as facts. When I submit an article for our local newsletter, I cite references that are copyright books, articles and quotes.

    James A. Ward in his book "The Fall Of The Packard Motor Company" devoted several chapters, interviews with surviving board members and notes and archives he was given access. He went into detailed information why sales for the 1956 Packard and Clipper line fell 67% from 1955.

    Bob Miles

    Comment


    • #3
      And on the day the Studebaker-Packard Corporation introduced the Avanti, they formally dropped the word Packard from the corporate identity.
      Brad Johnson,
      SDC since 1975, ASC since 1990
      Pine Grove Mills, Pa.
      '33 Rockne 10, '51 Commander Starlight. '53 Commander Starlight
      '56 Sky Hawk in process

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by 6hk71400 View Post
        Interesting. Did this facebook article give any credit or resources that were cited for the article?

        Bob Miles
        Actually, it showed up on a page named ‘Michigan Automotive Inspection Services’. Owner John Hansen does pre-purchase inspections of cars. His page has occasional stories in this style on various subject vehicles on occasion. Always well written but no sources cited, so I assume they are written by the John. He does highly involved inspections and is enough of an authority in the field that he gives lectures at the Gilmore Museum. He has written some fascinating pieces.
        Last edited by Bob Andrews; 05-09-2021, 12:31 AM.
        Proud NON-CASO

        I do not prize the word "cheap." It is not a badge of honor...it is a symbol of despair. ~ William McKinley

        If it is decreed that I should go down, then let me go down linked with the truth - let me die in the advocacy of what is just and right.- Lincoln

        GOD BLESS AMERICA

        Ephesians 6:10-17
        Romans 15:13
        Deuteronomy 31:6
        Proverbs 28:1

        Illegitimi non carborundum

        Comment


        • #5
          As a Packard fan, and a long time member of the Packard Club, that is the story I have been hearing since the seventies as it nursed our wounded pride and made Packard out as the aggrieved party in the merger. Some how those slick boys down there in South Bend were able to fool not only Packard management but also a Wall Street firm that handled all the legal details of the merger. Hmm. That means that Studebaker must have been filing false tax returns also so that no one would notice how much money they were losing. I don't think so.

          My friend Dwight who is a rabid Packard fan and no particular friend of Studebaker begs to differ with this old narrative. He has poored over financial statements and year end reports of both companies. With the caveat that I have not done so, he tells me this--perhaps someone else with better sources can verify: Yes Studebaker was losing money at the time of the merger. So was Packard. ALL of the independents were hammered that year for many reasons including the Ford-Chevy sales war. But Dwight tells me Studebaker had more substantial cash reserves than Packard did. That should be a on public record somewhere as both were publicly traded corporations. Also true that Studebaker's labor costs were too high, but I recall that was brought in line by the end of 55.

          In 54 Packard had to build and launch a new engine and transmission plant. Oh, and their body supplier, Briggs, was sold to Chrysler so they had to lease the old Briggs plant and outfit it for complete assembly of the cars. That's another whole can of worms we will leave for now. Anyway--expenses were huge and warranty costs were high though I've never heard a figure near that high. Dwight maintains that Packard sucked cash out Studebaker and not the other way around. That story makes the Packard oldtimers feel good--you ought to hear them talks s---- about Stude, but I'm pretty sure it is not true.



          Comment


          • #6
            Ross, as you can see, the article agrees with your friend’s assessment.
            Proud NON-CASO

            I do not prize the word "cheap." It is not a badge of honor...it is a symbol of despair. ~ William McKinley

            If it is decreed that I should go down, then let me go down linked with the truth - let me die in the advocacy of what is just and right.- Lincoln

            GOD BLESS AMERICA

            Ephesians 6:10-17
            Romans 15:13
            Deuteronomy 31:6
            Proverbs 28:1

            Illegitimi non carborundum

            Comment


            • #7
              Great topic! I took S2D to a local car show today and saw 3 Packards. The black 4 door conv was once owned by Herbert Hoover and the other conv is driven daily by its owner rain or shine; it’s his only car in the DC area.

              I had another older guy come and ask me about S2D and he asked me what engine it had and I said a Corvette mill. He asked what happened to it’s original Packard v8. I told him it was originally studebaker powered and he was like not with a V8 though. I told him that the only Stude that had a packard engine was the 56 golden hawk. I told him I had a second 54 studebaker and he asked what I thought powered it, that studebaker never had a V8. I couldn’t help but laugh (internally). I told him that when Packard/Studebaker joined forces... but Studebaker was around a long time before Packard and made some great V8 engines to include the supercharged cars. He was honestly surprised and then got lost in talking about the hardtop body style.

              It was a fun show and seeing 3 packards together was pretty special. The 3 Packard owners couldn’t have been any nicer guys and wanted to share their studebaker history as well. The guy that drives his daily was an actor in musicals and plays and when he was 9 years old in 53, he acted in a production put on in San Francisco by the local dealers about studebaker and their wagons and eventually the brand new 53 model. It was to raise public interest of the 53s and he said he was in love with them since. He said he would send me a copy of the program. How cool is that?!?

              Comment


              • #8
                About four years ago our Eastern NC chapter hosted a meet in conjunction with a local Packard and a local Mercedes-Benz club. Unfortunately no one from the Packard group could attend, but they were very cordial during our organizing meetings, as were the M-B folks, and the event was well received.
                Mike Davis
                1964 Champ 8E7-122 "Stuey"

                Comment


                • #9
                  I don't think the Packard Clipper was a tired model in 1946. It was a brand new design in April of 1941 and very few 1942s were built. They probably should have continued with that classic look, as is, until the total redesign for the 1951 models was introduced.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Semon "Bunkie" Knudsen put things in perspective: You can sell a young mans car to an old man, but you can't sell an old mans car to a young man. He made that statement when he took the reins of Pontiac management. In 1948 you had a choice of a bathtub or tail fin, electromatic clutch or 4 speed Hydromatic. In 1949 you could get a Station Sedan or a Coupe De Ville 2 door hardtop, an overhead valve V8 or a straight eight.

                    As Bob Palma said one time about when his 1956 Clipper was in a parade, someone said Packard used to mean money. He said back "If something breaks, it still does!"

                    Bob Miles

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X