NOS power stearing control valve 61 Hawk

[Swamper714]

Hi, I am in need of a NOS p.s. control valve for my 61 Hawk if any one has one or knowledge of where I could find one it would be appreciated.

Thank you

[StudeRich]

If you explain why you think you need the whole thing, we may be able to come up with a more doable fix for yours since; "they don't make these anymore."

[jackb]

unless terminally damaged... a good used one with new seals should be fine. Every lubricant place on these cars will eventually leak.... that's what big cardboard boxes are for... Dave T. probably has a few in his garage.....or WCD garage....

[mbstude]

Part number for the valve is 1551365. Someone, somewhere, has an NOS one. Posting here is a good start.

....or WCD garage....

Bob sold his parts inventory to Stephen Allen's.

[DieselJim]

65 Mustang uses the same system. The spool valve is made the same. If you order a Mustang spool valve, also order the seal kit. The seal are larger.

[bezhawk]

The Mustang spool valve is a different size, and the parts are not interchangeable with Studebaker. You can use the whole thing however.
To put it on the Stude pitman arm, you have to take the thing apart completely anyways. There is nothing magic about rebuilding a Stude steering control valve. You just have to make sure there are no nicks or scratches in the bore, or on the valve. Be sure to replace, or at least reface the hose flare seats.

[DieselJim]

65 Mustang uses the same system. The spool valve is made the same. If you order a Mustang spool valve, also order the seal kit. The seal are larger.

Thanks for the correction.

[Swamper714]

Thank you, it will be attempted.

[Swamper714]

Thank you for that information

[Swamper714]

Thank you for the part number and information.

[Swamper714]

Thank you for that information

[Swamper714]

Thank you for that information, I am using the big cardboard box method as we speak.

[Swamper714]

The bore is pitted and has been cleaned up the best as possible with new seals installed, it is better at this point but their is still room for improvement. I am looking for perfection possibly but hoping for something that is probably not possible more than likely. Thanks for your input.

That is why I was looking for NOS.