Results 1 to 11 of 11

Thread: The Infamous Studebaker "Lean"

  1. #1
    President Member 345 DeSoto's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Location
    Skaneateles, NY/Port St.Lucie, FL
    Posts
    1,284

    The Infamous Studebaker "Lean"

    Both of my front and rear springs on my Sky Hawk are the same, side to side. For some reason, it leans a bit to the driver side...just enough to notice. Laying a level over the axle hump in the trunk verifies it. I installed a set of Air Shocks on the rear, each shock having it's own fill fitting. I filled the passenger side shock to 20lb, per instructions, and using the level I installed 75lbs in the driver side to bring the rear level. What a difference in ride quality! Not to mention, the rear universal joint no longer ticks the rear of the tunnel upon hard acceleration (with new one piece drive shaft). It improved the front, to the extent that I had to tweek the headlight adjustment just a bit. Win, win...

  2. #2
    President Member Commander Eddie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Dundee, Oregon
    Posts
    3,370
    I have never heard of that being a thing with Studebakers. I have owned many and never experienced that. It sounds like you found a good solution to your problem, however. Very creative thinking.
    Ed Sallia
    Dundee, OR

    Sol Lucet Omnibus

  3. #3
    President Member bensherb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2015
    Location
    Tracy / Goleta Ca.
    Posts
    1,347
    My GT is like that. I can measure everything and both sides measure out the same; even with the left spring mounted in the lower hole per the manual. Looking at it from the rear the left side appears about 1" lower than the right side.

  4. #4
    President Member tsenecal's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2016
    Location
    Elko NV
    Posts
    1,056
    It may be a temporary solution. I don't believe that the shock mounts were engineered to take that much extra weight. It may be something that you can reinforce, if they cause you trouble. I've seen lots of broken shock mounts that were only exposed to the wear and tear of the shock absorber.

  5. #5
    Speedster Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    arundel, maine
    Posts
    325
    Don't you have two mounting holes for the front of the springs? The right spring
    goes in the top hole and the left goes in the bottom hole.

  6. #6
    President Member bensherb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2015
    Location
    Tracy / Goleta Ca.
    Posts
    1,347
    Quote Originally Posted by paul shuffleburg View Post
    Don't you have two mounting holes for the front of the springs? The right spring
    goes in the top hole and the left goes in the bottom hole.
    Yep, that's the way mine are mounted.

  7. #7
    Golden Hawk Member StudeRich's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Ferndale, WA, USA.
    Posts
    29,780
    They tried to compensate for all the extra Load of; the Steering Gear and Column, the Battery, the offset Gas Tank and the always present Driver by using those offset Front of the Rear Spring Mounts.

    But when your springs are shot, they are done.
    Standard shocks were not designed to make up the difference, air shocks WILL band-Aid the problem however with some ride quality loss and possible damage to the Crossmember.
    StudeRich
    Second Generation Stude Driver,
    Proud '54 Starliner Owner




  8. #8
    President Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    british columbia
    Posts
    1,317
    My 54 Champion sedan was leaning on the driver's side, visually nothing seemed out of the ordinary. I decided to have the springs re-arced, however when I removed the rear springs I found a broken leaf. It was one of the smaller components and it was not visible until they were removed and disassembled. I went to an old spring company that had the specs for my Studebaker where they made new springs that fit perfect. Now the car sits normal and square. The cost was $300 for the pair.

  9. #9
    President Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2016
    Location
    Westbrook, MN
    Posts
    909
    My 61 is like that, too! I've replaced front springs years ago with NOS and switched rears. No difference! So it is what it is.

  10. #10
    President Member bensherb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2015
    Location
    Tracy / Goleta Ca.
    Posts
    1,347
    Quote Originally Posted by Jeffry Cassel View Post
    My 61 is like that, too! I've replaced front springs years ago with NOS and switched rears. No difference! So it is what it is.
    Same here. Oddly the '53 still has it's original springs and doesn't do it.

  11. #11
    Silver Hawk Member JoeHall's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Kentucky, USA.
    Posts
    6,236
    I have seen many Studes with the subject lean, but it is usually due to sagging springs, incorrectly installed driver's side rear spring, and missing spacer under the front spring on driver's side. So new front & rear springs, the rear spring forward mount in the correct hole on the driver's side, and a factory recommended spacer on the driver side will usually correct the lean. Of course if the driver is super sized and riding solo, the lean will return, but autocorrect when the driver exits the vehicle. LOL

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •