Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Motor Mounts

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Swifster
    replied
    OK, I stand corrected. Still learnin' don't cha know!

    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Tom - Valrico, FL

    1964 Studebaker Daytona - 289 4V, 4-Speed (Cost To Date: $1794.98)

    Leave a comment:


  • JDP
    replied
    i think you are mistaken, the mounts are way different, the so called R3 mounts are thinner.

    JDP/Maryland
    64 Daytona HT/R2 clone
    64 GT R2
    63 Lark 2 door
    58 Scotsman
    52 & 53 Starliner
    51 Commander
    39 Coupe express
    39 Coupe express (rod)

    Leave a comment:


  • Swifster
    replied
    quote:Originally posted by JDP

    Huh ?? Different engines and mounts in 1965-66.
    Apparently the mount is thinner for hood clearence with the Chevrolet engines. Same type of mount, only smaller.

    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Tom - Valrico, FL

    1964 Studebaker Daytona - 289 4V, 4-Speed (Cost To Date: $1794.98)

    Leave a comment:


  • JDP
    replied
    Huh ?? Different engines and mounts in 1965-66.

    JDP/Maryland
    64 Daytona HT/R2 clone
    64 GT R2
    63 Lark 2 door
    52 & 53 Starliner
    51 Commander
    39 Coupe express
    39 Coupe express (rod)

    Leave a comment:


  • Swifster
    started a topic Motor Mounts

    Motor Mounts

    The '65-'66 mounts are thinner than the '64 and earlier mounts. How much clearence does this really give you? And if anyone has done this, how did this effect ground clearence and crossmember clearence? Thanks!

    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Tom - Valrico, FL

    1964 Studebaker Daytona - 289 4V, 4-Speed (Cost To Date: $1794.98)

Working...
X