Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Why no Fords?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    quote:Originally posted by cortica37

    And thus the 50's adadge - "There's no replacement for displacement."
    I come across a few Chevy 4.3 V6 conversions. Seems like it might be a light, compact engine and a potential candidate to replace the older 164/169 Studes. Anybody got any knowledge about problems with this conversion? Also, how about a Mopar slant six? It has a pretty good reputation from what I hear. I'm thinking along the lines of a moderate performance improvement and not a 1/4 miler.
    The 4.3L will bolt in with the '65-'66 Chevy mounts. It's a 350 with two cylinders missing, and will take the front accessory drives from the 350 as well. If built for power, you can get over 300 HP N/A. Put a supercharger on the front and you can get an easy 475 HP.

    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Tom - Valrico, FL

    1964 Studebaker Daytona - 289 4V, 4-Speed

    Tom - Bradenton, FL

    1964 Studebaker Daytona - 289 4V, 4-Speed (Cost To Date: $2514.10)
    1964 Studebaker Commander - 170 1V, 3-Speed w/OD

    Comment


    • #32
      quote:Originally posted by cortica37
      I come across a few Chevy 4.3 V6 conversions. Seems like it might be a light, compact engine and a potential candidate to replace the older 164/169 Studes. Anybody got any knowledge about problems with this conversion?
      It's essentially the same amount of trouble/work/expense to put in a small block Chevy V8 as it is to put in a 4.3 V6. You'll regret the V6. The car wouldn't be easily resaleable, no real increase in fuel mileage, no V8 sound [8D]. You can get a brand spanking new Chevy V8 for as little as $999

      http://www.crateenginedepot.com/stor...91-P36C63.aspx

      "I coulda had a V8"




      Dick Steinkamp
      Bellingham, WA

      Comment


      • #33
        Wow![:0] One of those and a JC Whitney catalog and you're ready for the next trophy trials![B)]

        Miscreant adrift in
        the BerStuda Triangle


        1957 Transtar 1/2ton
        1960 Larkvertible V8
        1958 Provincial wagon
        1953 Commander coupe

        No deceptive flags to prove I'm patriotic - no biblical BS to impress - just ME and Studebakers - as it should be.

        Comment


        • #34
          I'm putting a 302 or 351 in my 62 hawk, tired of 350s I have 302 thinking I might stroke to a 347 with injection it should run very nicely. if money were no object I'd put a 5.7 hemi crate in it

          Comment


          • #35
            quote:Originally posted by black56hawk For CHEAP street horsepower, IMHO it's hard to beat a big-block Mopar.
            After getting that ride in your '67 HEMI Charger; I'll definitely agree!

            Matthew Burnette
            '59 Scotsman
            '63 Daytona
            Hazlehurst, GA


            Cruising the Proving Ground Test Track

            Comment


            • #36
              I got my old Studie because I like the styling, engineering and the whole design philosophy that went into creating the car. And I like it especially because it's different and an Independent, not just another dead-common, brown-wrapper, big three product. I know that there are compelling arguments for just sticking a SBC or BBC into the old gal but to me that seems too much like going with the crowd. So, if I decide to swap I'd like take a different path and go with something different, especially since I can do my own work and resale is not a factor. Maybe a Studie V-8 is the answer. Thanks for the all the input guys.

              Comment


              • #37
                Dave, I turned down the chance to buy a 58 Golden Hawk a few years back. My decision was more because it was a real Bondo Baby than the fact it had been fitted with a 351.
                I DID buy the remanufactured 259 (service replacement engine), and NOS HD Flight-o-matic that the guy had. Gave $500 for the pair and it was a toss-up as to which of us thought we had just "taken" the other![}]

                Miscreant adrift in
                the BerStuda Triangle


                1957 Transtar 1/2ton
                1960 Larkvertible V8
                1958 Provincial wagon
                1953 Commander coupe

                No deceptive flags to prove I'm patriotic - no biblical BS to impress - just ME and Studebakers - as it should be.

                Comment


                • #38
                  Oldsmobile Toronado's also had 510 ft lbs of torque at 3,000 rpm's.
                  Mono mind in a stereo world

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    No, they were all Found On The Road Dead.........

                    quote:Originally posted by skyway

                    Because they need to be fixed or repaired daily?

                    Sorry, couldn't help myself.

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      Who coined the phrase........"Race on Sunday, sell on Monday?"

                      Comment


                      • #41
                        Wait til you guys see my 54 lakester (hence the name, Studebakester) It will be powered by a 292 Chevy 6 sporting 3 sidedraft webers and other go fast goodies with a 6 speed behind it and a quick change rear end. Of course, 18" are missing out of the middle of it (lengthwise) and so is the top.

                        It's a disease for which there is no cure or proper name. A rare form of it at that.

                        Worry is a waste of imagination.

                        studebakester

                        Comment

                        Working...
                        X