Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

No Rol versus Anti-Creep

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • No Rol versus Anti-Creep

    The prebent brake lines I ordered from Inline Tube are way too short, and in fact both my '63 and '64 have an extra piece of tube with a connector that is conspicuously absent from my new, $179 prebent set.

    Looking in the Chassis Parts Catalog, I see a diagram that shows two different diagrams for brake lines, one labelled "With No Rol" and the other labelled "With Anti-Creep".

    WTH's the difference?

    In hindsight, I do think it's odd that Inline Tube's website shows "'59-64 Lark 2-door 109 WB with no Hill Holder", when the master cylinders changed over the years and no mention of power brakes versus none, or drum versus disc brakes.

    Bill Pressler
    Kent, OH
    '63 Lark Daytona Skytop R1
    '64 Daytona Hardtop
    Bill Pressler
    Kent, OH
    (formerly Greenville, PA)
    Currently owned: 1966 Cruiser, Timberline Turquoise, 26K miles
    Formerly owned: 1963 Lark Daytona Skytop R1, Ermine White
    1964 Daytona Hardtop, Strato Blue
    1966 Daytona Sports Sedan, Niagara Blue Mist
    All are in Australia now

  • #2
    Anti creep was for auto trans cars, no roll for cars with manual trans.



    quote:Originally posted by Bill Pressler

    The prebent brake lines I ordered from Inline Tube are way too short, and in fact both my '63 and '64 have an extra piece of tube with a connector that is conspicuously absent from my new, $179 prebent set.

    Looking in the Chassis Parts Catalog, I see a diagram that shows two different diagrams for brake lines, one labelled "With No Rol" and the other labelled "With Anti-Creep".

    WTH's the difference?

    In hindsight, I do think it's odd that Inline Tube's website shows "'59-64 Lark 2-door 109 WB with no Hill Holder", when the master cylinders changed over the years and no mention of power brakes versus none, or drum versus disc brakes.

    Bill Pressler
    Kent, OH
    '63 Lark Daytona Skytop R1
    '64 Daytona Hardtop

    Comment


    • #3
      Anti creep was for auto trans cars, no roll for cars with manual trans.

      Thanks! I guess that makes sense! Weird, there's no diagram that I can see in the manual, of brake lines for '63-64 drum brake cars, no power, with neither No Rol nor Anti-Creep!

      Bill Pressler
      Kent, OH
      '63 Lark Daytona Skytop R1
      '64 Daytona Hardtop

      [u]</u>[u]</u>
      Bill Pressler
      Kent, OH
      (formerly Greenville, PA)
      Currently owned: 1966 Cruiser, Timberline Turquoise, 26K miles
      Formerly owned: 1963 Lark Daytona Skytop R1, Ermine White
      1964 Daytona Hardtop, Strato Blue
      1966 Daytona Sports Sedan, Niagara Blue Mist
      All are in Australia now

      Comment


      • #4
        I guess they expect that full-car kind of generic diagram on Pg. 315 & 316, Plate 11-7 and 11-8 should cover it! ...NOT! (entirely)!

        You would have picture the Master Cylinder with TWO lines coming out of the Brass dual port "Y" instead of only one, as shown for the Hill Holder cars. [:0]

        I really do not believe ANY aftermarket brake line Mfg. could ever get all of the configurations correct on all these models and options.
        Maybe the one that makes them from your old sample would actually work with all that shipping expense of sending a 5 or 6 foot long box or whatever two ways.

        StudeRich
        StudeRich
        Second Generation Stude Driver,
        Proud '54 Starliner Owner

        Comment

        Working...
        X