Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

1964 GT Hawk R2 Brake Issue

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • bezhawk
    replied
    If it is an R2, then it would most likely also have been equipped with factory disc brakes (Dunlop/Bendix). It also would have the type "F" Bendix Hydro-Vac brake booster. There would have been a remote filler reservoir mounted on the passenger side of the firewall. Also the brake pedal leverage would be set up for the power brakes, and is far less mechanical advantage over non power brakes. That is probably the biggest issue with needing so much pedal pressure to stop it after the booster being disconnected. Yes, the original system was a single circuit, and there is only one line in, and one line out of the booster. The easiest way to get where it stops safely and well, would be to purchase a new disc brake type booster from Studebaker vendors like SI. and hook up the front circuit to it. It is ok to have the rear non power assist, since the rears only contribute 30% of the stopping power.
    The 2nd route to go would be to find a non power brake pedal with more leverage and see if that makes it good enough for your satisfaction. Also a higher coefficient of friction brake pad will also contribute to it stopping better than the stock friction materials.

    Leave a comment:


  • CO64
    replied
    Good Morning! Wow, thanks for the early morning responses. I do plan to join the local chapter here in AZ.

    Looks like I have work to do.

    I will do some searching on the car. Really didn't know where to look for original brake stuff, as the Hawk is configured very different from any 64 I own : )

    I will get the dimensions of the brake pedal. I will go out on a limb and say it was an original power brake system. No car I own had the booster on the fender, so at first wasn't even sure what it was. I will get the details.

    The car does have front discs, but the type are unknown to me. I will try to take a picture if I can. I can confirm that the brakes feel as if the rears are doing nothing. Also, I was very suspicious of seeing a little brake proportioning valve on the system. Did not look stock or even appropriate. Might have been an attempt to comp for the new config (which I can attest, didn't help).

    Also, it did seem to me that the big Bendix Hydrovac unit only had 1 "in" line and 1 "out" line, so it made me think that it was more like a traditional 64-esque brake system where all brakes are on one system, not split.

    OK, Please give me a day or two and I will get some pics, dimensions, etc and get a post back up. Car is temporarily stored in a rented garage. Will need to get over there and get info.
    I really appreciate the help. More to come.

    Thx

    Art

    Leave a comment:


  • Colgate Studebaker
    replied
    First, welcome to the forum! There is a ton of good advice on this site and if you join a local chapter of the SDC (and of course the national club) you will likely find many folks willing to lend a hand or opinion. Owning a Hawk, you will get excellent advice from non other than Joe Hall (above) who has 3 of them and drives them regularly. He is a Hawk brake mastermind, so his word is pretty darned good (and he's a really nice guy too). Good luck with your car, hope you visit here often. Bill

    Leave a comment:


  • JoeHall
    replied
    Sounds like your car has been modified, at least to some extent, in effort to make the brakes more safe and/or efficient. Along the way, brake light wiring may have been screwed up, and brake fluid changed to something else. (Since DOT 3 and 5 are incompatible, must figure out what it has now.) First, need to know if your car came stock with PDBs. If so, in addition to the MC, and maybe the fluid, need to know what else has been swapped out/modified. Since the MC has been swapped, at the very least, the plumbing has been altered, which is a no-no with factory PDBs. With factory PDBs, if the rears are plumbed to bypass the hydrovac, they are rendered nearly inoperable.

    Key questions:
    Does your car have a wide brake pedal pad? How tall is the brake pedal, measured from top of pad the floor? Does the hydrovac have one, or two bleeder valves? Is there a brake fluid reservoir mounted on the passenger side of the firewall? Looking under the front end, at inboard side of the front wheels, does your car have front discs? If possible, it may be good to take pix of the components and post them here; also order a copy of the factory production order for your car, to see what it came with. Also, you can go to Bob Johnstone's web site here to look at pix to compare with yours.

    Advice from here depends on what your car came with, and what it has now. If it came with PDBs, and not heavily modified, it may be easiest to restore them to original, with any needed fresh components. Then, they will work as good as anything else out there, and far better than most cobo-jobs. To restore them to OEM, the dual MC must be removed, and an OEM one reinstalled, with original plumbing restored to go through the HV. Again, first need to know what came in the car, and what is in it now.

    Hope this helps.

    Leave a comment:


  • bensherb
    replied
    "Is what I described on the split system booster a factory installation? NO
    If so, were the brake lines just mounted around (i.e. bypassed) the booster and I have manual brake now? YES
    Was the system originally split, front/ rear?" NO

    On manual brake cars the pressure brake lamp switch is in the fitting where the line from the master cylinder meets the front brake lines. It sounds like your switch is not in the system, being connected to a bypassed booster.

    I've never had any problem with silicone DOT5 brake fluid and pressure switches. I have one that's been working fine since '86 and another since '95.

    Leave a comment:


  • wwundt
    replied
    Does the car still have its original type Bendix/Dunlop front disk brakes or a later conversion i.e. Turner? The original master cylinder under the floorboard was not a dual master cylinder. There should be a reservoir mounted on the firewall with a line down to the cap on the master cylinder to keep it full of fluid. The line from the master cylinder is routed to the Hydrovac. The wheel cylinders are connected to the Hydrovac, not the master cylinder. Apparently the system has been modified? If the lines from the Hydrovac are not connected to anything I would assume the brake switch is not being activated. If the system is filled with silicone brake fluid the brake switch has probably failed anyway.

    Leave a comment:


  • CO64
    started a topic Brakes: 1964 GT Hawk R2 Brake Issue

    1964 GT Hawk R2 Brake Issue

    Hi Members, Looking for some help.
    I am the proud new owner of a 1964 R2 Hawk. My first Studie. For those that followed, it's the one that just sold at Mecum Glendale in AZ. 64 V1085.

    OK, here is what I found.

    I drove the car home. Brakes seemed as if the power booster was not operating. Car would stop, but a lot of pedal pressure was required and there were no brake lights.

    Investigation found the following (note I have ordered a shop manual, but don't have it yet, so learning on the fly).

    Pedal is connected to a dual master cylinder that looks very clean and is mounted under (with virtually no room to remove the cover and fill or check it) the floor boards on the frame. I traced one brake line to the rear and it has a proportioning valve about under the driver's seat area.

    The other line goes to the front disc brakes.

    My car has the Bendix Hydrovac booster on the driver's site fender. There is where the brake light pressure switch is mounted and the wires are present.
    I followed the brake lines from the booster and they are not connected to anything. Explains why the pressure switch is not being activated and no brake lights.

    So, here are my questions:

    Is what I described on the split system booster a factory installation?
    If so, were the brake lines just mounted around (i.e. bypassed) the booster and I have manual brake now?
    Was the system originally split, front/ rear? Pretty progressive for the day, if it was!

    I am assuming my booster needs to be rebuilt and/or replaced. I saw another thread on the forum on a couple of places that may be able to help. Any recommendations are appreciated.

    From what I described, can anyone tell me what I should have found on the car if the brake system was stock? If not, what should be there.
    Then, any recommendations on how to correct?

    Thx. Art
Working...
X