What would be a common swap from a Power flight auto over to 4 speed manual I am running a 289 Packard and the Danna diff
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
1963 Lark Gearbox swap opinion
Collapse
X
-
Tags: None
-
The 289 should be Studebaker. T10s were the 4 Spds that were stock. Several individuals have installed t5s, tkos etc. In any case, you would need the manual "ford" pattern bell housing as well as flywheel, clutch and clutch linkage and if course a shifter for the t10. If you go the t5, tko, or other you would need the adapters for the stock manual bell housing.
I am happy with my Avanti R1, T10 and 3.54 Dana tt.78 Avanti RQB 2792
64 Avanti R1 R5408
63 Avanti R1 R4551
63 Avanti R1 R2281
62 GT Hawk V15949
56 GH 6032504
56 GH 6032588
55 Speedster 7160047
55 Speedster 7165279
-
Once the transmission selection has been determined, the clutch linkage is a crucial decision. Your Lark should have the suspended pedals, so it's possible to use the OEM Lark manual clutch linkage, but unfortunately, it's a flawed design. on all my recent conversions, I've used a hydraulic clutch master cylinder and hydraulic throwout bearing.
jack vinesPackardV8
Comment
-
Originally posted by 64studeavanti View PostThe 289 should be Studebaker. T10s were the 4 Spds that were stock. Several individuals have installed t5s, tkos etc. In any case, you would need the manual "ford" pattern bell housing as well as flywheel, clutch and clutch linkage and if course a shifter for the t10. If you go the t5, tko, or other you would need the adapters for the stock manual bell housing.
I am happy with my Avanti R1, T10 and 3.54 Dana tt.
Comment
-
Originally posted by PackardV8 View PostOnce the transmission selection has been determined, the clutch linkage is a crucial decision. Your Lark should have the suspended pedals, so it's possible to use the OEM Lark manual clutch linkage, but unfortunately, it's a flawed design. on all my recent conversions, I've used a hydraulic clutch master cylinder and hydraulic throwout bearing.
jack vines
Comment
-
Originally posted by Rapps View Post
Thanks for the info . My engine number is "P" that is supposed to be 4 bbl Packard78 Avanti RQB 2792
64 Avanti R1 R5408
63 Avanti R1 R4551
63 Avanti R1 R2281
62 GT Hawk V15949
56 GH 6032504
56 GH 6032588
55 Speedster 7160047
55 Speedster 7165279
Comment
-
Model year starting engine numbers can be found in this table:
http://www.studebakerdriversclub.com/V8EngineID.aspSkip Lackie
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Rapps View PostIt probably makes sense just to rebuild the auto and source the correct floor change and linkage. I think they are a great combination
jack vinesPackardV8
Comment
-
I have a 61 Hawk 4 spd that last year experienced a xmission failure. Instead of rebuilding the T-4 I replaced it with a bolt in Mustang T-5. I used a 1994 World Class WCTS. WC means it can handle an extra 50hp. The case holes lined up to the bell housing. Other work had to be done. I have drafted a memo I was going to share with the forum but have not done it yet. I can post it if you think it will be of help. The 5 spd makes the car drive a lot better and smoother, especially with the dana rear end.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Al Kurz View PostI have a 61 Hawk 4 spd that last year experienced a xmission failure. Instead of rebuilding the T-4 I replaced it with a bolt in Mustang T-5./Cut/
Not a "Bolt-in", if you Modify the T-5 Front Bearing Support, Input Shaft, Driveshaft Yoke, and Clutch Linkage.StudeRich
Second Generation Stude Driver,
Proud '54 Starliner Owner
Comment
Comment