I approve of the subject matter, and I also approve of the canvas...

[pbrown]

(Don't think this is offensive, but you never know!)

Here's a striking rendition of a 1960 Studebaker Champ.

Not generally a tattoo fan, but can make exception...

This fellow only works on young women because ""

Yeah, sure!

More can be found at http://www.brandpowder.com/king-of-tattoo/

[StudeRich]

Not offensive at all! More, more, lower please!
Really, how many pretty women would want a '62 Champ on their back?

As you know, it can't be a '60 with a Wide Box P2.

[doug]

I don't believe it's real. It is cute.

[52-fan]

I know there are talented artists, but that looks like a photograph.

[LeoH]

Not offensive at all! More, more, lower please!
Really, how many pretty women would want a '62 Champ on their back?

He happened to oblige you on that page, just a different brand is all....

[Xcalibur]

I'll take TWO... without the truck!

[53commander]

Having many tattoos as well as being a fan I would have to say that that one isn't real. As far as skin texture of male vs female I would disagree as some of mine are highly detailed. My wife's do display the color better though.

[TX Rebel]

Looks like a photoshop job or a temporary transfer, though there seems to be no limit to the stupid things young women will do to deface & defile their bodies now-days.