Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Might be a little bargain: '65 Cruiser on Ontario Kijiji for $3,000

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Might be a little bargain: '65 Cruiser on Ontario Kijiji for $3,000

    Don't know how clean it really is, ya gotta wonder if it's been exposed to salty winters...
    Be nice little round-towner, though. BTW, $3K Canadian is $2,724 in Yankee bucks.

    http://ontario.kijiji.ca/c-cars-vehi...AdIdZ566882316


    [IMG]http://thumbnails110.********.com/31252/9b536b312511823.jpg[/IMG] [IMG]http://thumbnails112.********.com/31252/10b9f4312511827.jpg[/IMG] [IMG]http://thumbnails112.********.com/31252/edf947312511829.jpg[/IMG]

  • #2
    Could never understand why Studebaker would offer their top of the line model in '64-'66 with an anemic base 6 and three on the tree. It sure as hell didn't help boost any public perception that the Cruiser was the best that Studebaker offered. Little wonder they went under.
    A former '65 Cruiser 8 owner.

    Comment


    • #3
      Three of us from the Hamilton Chapter checked this Cruiser out last year. It is drivable (one of us trundled round the block in it with the current owner riding shotgun)...but both the engine and the brakes need work. Still, I could see someone from Western NY making out OK with it given the current exchange rate, if that buyer could do the work himself/herself...

      S.

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by Jessie J. View Post
        Could never understand why Studebaker would offer their top of the line model in '64-'66 with an anemic base 6 and three on the tree. It sure as hell didn't help boost any public perception that the Cruiser was the best that Studebaker offered. Little wonder they went under.
        A former '65 Cruiser 8 owner.
        In fairness this decision had absolutely nothing to do with our closing. If you've got a few days there's much to read about the true story, including facts in my book.

        The reason we decided to offer a minimally equipped Cruiser was to attract buyers who we're looking for our prestige car but didn't have the necessary $$$. Remember Mustang then? Ford offered a GT model with all the bells but you could get a base model for a lot less and you'd still turn heads.

        Stu Chapman

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by Stu Chapman View Post
          In fairness this decision had absolutely nothing to do with our closing. If you've got a few days there's much to read about the true story, including facts in my book.

          The reason we decided to offer a minimally equipped Cruiser was to attract buyers who we're looking for our prestige car but didn't have the necessary $$$. Remember Mustang then? Ford offered a GT model with all the bells but you could get a base model for a lot less and you'd still turn heads.

          Stu Chapman
          In all fairness the 1965-66 Mustang GT had a 289-4V engine as standard. No Six was even offered in that model.
          --------------------------------------

          Sold my 1962; Studeless at the moment

          Borrowed Bams50's sigline here:

          "Do they all not, by mere virtue of having survived as relics of a bygone era, amass a level of respect perhaps not accorded to them when they were new?"

          Comment


          • #6
            A "Base Model" is a base model, not a GT.
            Of course you could buy a Mustang with a 6, even in the U.S.A.

            I remember looking at them when they came out at Parnelli Jones Ford in Torrance, CA and noticed that as Stu says, you could choose how nice or how Fast you wanted.
            The Chrome on the Studebaker design 1/4 Panel body crease, the rocker Panel Moulding, the Trans. and Engine; 6, 260, 289 and Hi Performance 289, everything was available, FOR A PRICE!
            StudeRich
            Second Generation Stude Driver,
            Proud '54 Starliner Owner

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by 1962larksedan View Post
              In all fairness the 1965-66 Mustang GT had a 289-4V engine as standard. No Six was even offered in that model.
              Agreed. My comparis9n was only intended to demonstrate why we did what we did. By the way the reason we went back to single headlights in 1966 was because Mustang had them and we figured it worked for them so why not us.

              Stu Chapman

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by Stu Chapman View Post
                By the way the reason we went back to single headlights in 1966 was because Mustang had them and we figured it worked for them so why not us.

                Stu Chapman
                Thanks Stu! That's an interesting factoid that I had not previously heard about. I do like the look of the '66 front end - especially the Commander/Wagonaire style (guess that's why I bought one) and it has the 230 six as well (another reason I bought it). FWIW I fully support being able to buy an upscale model with a smaller displacement engine - in fact the newer iron in my fleet is from manufacturers that offered such products. I have reached a point where fuel economy and luxury are the more important factors in buying a vehicle.
                Mark Hayden
                '66 Commander
                Zone Coordinator
                Pacific Can-Am Zone

                Comment


                • #9
                  It was my distinct pleasure to have accompanied my father to our local Studebaker showroom and assist in the choice of our new 1966 Studebaker.
                  We agreed the Commander was the most appealing to both of us. He was the one who would be making the payments so it had to be a 4 door, I got to pick the color (Richelieu Blue) and dad, for the first time in years, decided to go sporty with a manual 3 speed with o/d.
                  We both proud as peacocks got a lot of fun and grins out of our new 'hot rod Chevybaker'
                  Dad had bought a new Studebaker every two years for most of his adult life like 20+ consecutive. He was extremely disappointed by Studebaker's shutdown (as was I) both of us would have continued on as loyal Studebaker customers indefinitely. Dad never owned another car that he was as satisfied with.
                  And I don't think I have either. When I was driving my '69 Camaro SS 396, what I really wanted was a mint '64 Daytona, when I had my '71 Road Runner, what I really wanted was a mint '64 Daytona, and on through a life-time of some very desirable models.
                  Have owned around a dozen Studebakers over the decades, and I presently own three '64 Daytona's ...but sadly they are anything but 'mint'.
                  But I'll never forget what it was like driving them when new. Nothing since has ever suited me as perfectly.
                  Last edited by Jessie J.; 03-07-2014, 05:39 PM.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Great story Jessie, very similar to mine when Dad bought his New late '64 Daytona Hardtop with 259 and Automatic.
                    It was a Canadian built of course, Astra White with Red all Vinyl Individual reclining seats. We picked it up Dec. 24, 1964 kinda a Christmas present.

                    Was your Dad's commander Overdrive a 194 or 230 6 Cyl. or 283 V8?
                    StudeRich
                    Second Generation Stude Driver,
                    Proud '54 Starliner Owner

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Thunderbolt 283. Our trade in was dad's Bordeaux Red '64 Commander 259 auto (my most favorite out of all dad's Studes that I can remember)

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Wish I was around in 1964/5/6 to buy a new Studebaker . Some of my favourite cars .

                        Unfortunately in that time span I had enough money to buy maybe the underdash Kleenex

                        dispenser and a refill ! Would have bought a '64 Daytona 289 R1 Hardtop powershift auto.

                        By 1966 , dragged kicking and screaming away from the Mustang lot , ( 2 year turnaround)

                        I would have got a '66 Daytona Sport Sedan ( 2 door ) with Vinyl Roof , 283 auto . Never

                        thought much about what I would buy in 1968 , probably an AMC Javelin 343 auto Coupe .

                        CRUISER

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Funny you should mention it. I had a '68 AMX 343 4 speed. Ran like stink. Short wheelbase and torque steer fun up the wazoo.
                          Quality was in the pits though. Glued in place door glass had a habit of falling out daily. Traded it off on 'The Great Pumpkin' a '70 Cougar Eliminator 428 with 4 gear, Drag Pac & 4.30 axle. Used it for my daily driver. Hey gas was still cheap in those days.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by StudeRich View Post
                            A "Base Model" is a base model, not a GT. Of course you could buy a Mustang with a 6, even in the U.S.A.

                            I remember looking at them when they came out at Vel's Ford in Torrance, CA.
                            1965 Mustang assembled before 8/23/1964: 170 & 200 I-6's, 260 2V, 289 2V, 289 4V, 289 4V HiPo.

                            From 8/23/1964, the 170 I-6 & 260 were cancelled.

                            There are two different 289's. Assembled before 8/23/1964 have a 5 bolt bell housing pattern. From 8/23/1964, have a 6 bolt bell housing pattern.

                            The timing cover and waterpump are also different before/from 8/23/1964.

                            Parnelli Jones was Vel Miletich's "silent partner" back then. I once rode in a car Jones was driving, it was pedal to the metal and to hell with the traffic!
                            Last edited by WinM1895; 03-11-2014, 03:36 PM.

                            Comment

                            Working...
                            X