From a standpoint of Canada, the union contribution to Studebaker's closing would absolutely be a MINUS 1. Our management relations with the union were very good and the line workers were very enthusiastic. Looking at South Bend I would have to say that I would place the rating at 1. There were certainly some problems in 1962 when Sherwood Egbert punched out a striker and was charged with assault, but that strike didn't contribute to our downfall.
For those who have forgotten, my long time friend and associate, Ed Dunbar joined Studebaker on January 1st 1964 with specific responsibilities for "divestments". Ed had previously been with Curtiss-Wright and his Studebaker contract was negotiated in 1963, BEFORE the December 9th 1963 closing announcement. He was hired specifically to begin the planning of the end of the Automotive Division.
You had to be involved as closely as I was to know that Studebaker's failure was multi-facetted but top management engineered our demise, not the unions. Randolph Guthrie and Byers Burlingame were merely paying lip service to our efforts to succeed.
Stu Chapman
For those who have forgotten, my long time friend and associate, Ed Dunbar joined Studebaker on January 1st 1964 with specific responsibilities for "divestments". Ed had previously been with Curtiss-Wright and his Studebaker contract was negotiated in 1963, BEFORE the December 9th 1963 closing announcement. He was hired specifically to begin the planning of the end of the Automotive Division.
You had to be involved as closely as I was to know that Studebaker's failure was multi-facetted but top management engineered our demise, not the unions. Randolph Guthrie and Byers Burlingame were merely paying lip service to our efforts to succeed.
Stu Chapman
Comment