Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Studebaker meet switched

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • rockne10
    replied
    Paul,
    You quoted Art 49 minutes before he posted. Isn't technology wonderful?

    Yes, Gettysburg was the first choice and Lancaster was second.

    Once you decide where to have the Meet, you need to negotiate rates for facilities. The lowest rates negotiable at Gettysburg would have incurred almost twice the expense to our members and our club. Gettysburg didn't want us bad enough.

    Lancaster is going to be OUTSTANDING!!!

    Leave a comment:


  • rockne10
    replied
    Paul,
    You quoted Art 49 minutes before he posted. Isn't technology wonderful?

    Yes, Gettysburg was the first choice and Lancaster was second.

    Once you decide where to have the Meet, you need to negotiate rates for facilities. The lowest rates negotiable at Gettysburg would have incurred almost twice the expense to our members and our club. Gettysburg didn't want us bad enough.

    Lancaster is going to be OUTSTANDING!!!

    Leave a comment:


  • monomaniac
    replied
    Yes, Lancaster was voted on and approved more than a year ago. Don't know where you heard the Gettysburg rumor.

    Leave a comment:


  • monomaniac
    replied
    Yes, Lancaster was voted on and approved more than a year ago. Don't know where you heard the Gettysburg rumor.

    Leave a comment:


  • 53k
    replied
    quote:Originally posted by monomaniac

    Yes, Lancaster was voted on and approved more than a year ago. Don't know where you heard the Gettysburg rumor.
    Gettysburg was the original plan. They changed to Lancaster later on (bad move IMHO).


    [img=right]http://www.frontiernet.net/~thejohnsons/Forum%20signature%20pix/R-4.JPG[/img=right][img=right]http://www.frontiernet.net/~thejohnsons/Forum%20signature%20pix/64L.JPG[/img=right][img=right]http://www.frontiernet.net/~thejohnsons/Forum%20signature%20pix/64P.jpg[/img=right][img=right]http://www.frontiernet.net/~thejohnsons/Forum%20signature%20pix/53K.jpg[/img=right]Paul Johnson
    '53 Commander Starliner (since 1966)
    '64 Daytona Wagonaire (original owner)
    '64 Daytona Convertible (2006)
    Museum R-4 engine

    Leave a comment:


  • 53k
    replied
    quote:Originally posted by monomaniac

    Yes, Lancaster was voted on and approved more than a year ago. Don't know where you heard the Gettysburg rumor.
    Gettysburg was the original plan. They changed to Lancaster later on (bad move IMHO).


    [img=right]http://www.frontiernet.net/~thejohnsons/Forum%20signature%20pix/R-4.JPG[/img=right][img=right]http://www.frontiernet.net/~thejohnsons/Forum%20signature%20pix/64L.JPG[/img=right][img=right]http://www.frontiernet.net/~thejohnsons/Forum%20signature%20pix/64P.jpg[/img=right][img=right]http://www.frontiernet.net/~thejohnsons/Forum%20signature%20pix/53K.jpg[/img=right]Paul Johnson
    '53 Commander Starliner (since 1966)
    '64 Daytona Wagonaire (original owner)
    '64 Daytona Convertible (2006)
    Museum R-4 engine

    Leave a comment:


  • studelover
    started a topic Studebaker meet switched

    Studebaker meet switched

    I hear that the Studebaker meet that was supposed to be in Gettysburg has been switched to Lancaster P.A. What happened I thought it was voted and approved.

    Studebakers forever!
Working...
X