Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Nice 66 Daytona sport sedan on eBay

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Nice 66 Daytona sport sedan on eBay

    Check out this beauty:

    http://tinyurl.com/ytpytf



    47k claimed miles, V8, original paint, vinyl top & interior. This car makes my heart flutter [:I]


    [img=left]http://members.cox.net/clarknovak/lark.gif[/img=left]

    Clark in San Diego
    '63 F2/Lark Standard
    http://studeblogger.blogspot.com

    Clark in San Diego | '63 Standard (F2) "Barney" | http://studeblogger.blogspot.com

  • #2
    This car IS a very nice original car! I would recommend it to anyone in the market for one. It is owned by a member in Edmonton, and the reason for the sale is he finally got his 'dream' Avanti.

    Craig

    Comment


    • #3
      This car IS a very nice original car! I would recommend it to anyone in the market for one. It is owned by a member in Edmonton, and the reason for the sale is he finally got his 'dream' Avanti.

      Craig

      Comment


      • #4
        I think it is a beautiful car! Wish it was mine. Not in my price range for sure.

        Randy_G
        South Bend or Bust 2007!
        God I miss chrome on cars.
        www.AutomotiveHistoryOnline.com

        Comment


        • #5
          I think it is a beautiful car! Wish it was mine. Not in my price range for sure.

          Randy_G
          South Bend or Bust 2007!
          God I miss chrome on cars.
          www.AutomotiveHistoryOnline.com

          Comment


          • #6
            I am so amazed at Studebaker prices - what other marque would let you get a collectible, original vehicle like this one for a measly 12 grand? Sure ain't gonna see no '66 GTO at that price...


            [img=left]http://members.cox.net/clarknovak/lark.gif[/img=left]

            Clark in San Diego
            '63 F2/Lark Standard
            http://studeblogger.blogspot.com

            Clark in San Diego | '63 Standard (F2) "Barney" | http://studeblogger.blogspot.com

            Comment


            • #7
              I am so amazed at Studebaker prices - what other marque would let you get a collectible, original vehicle like this one for a measly 12 grand? Sure ain't gonna see no '66 GTO at that price...


              [img=left]http://members.cox.net/clarknovak/lark.gif[/img=left]

              Clark in San Diego
              '63 F2/Lark Standard
              http://studeblogger.blogspot.com

              Clark in San Diego | '63 Standard (F2) "Barney" | http://studeblogger.blogspot.com

              Comment


              • #8
                [)]I have always wondered how those McKinnon Studes performed in comparison to 289 powered cars?[)]

                steve blake
                http://tinyurl.com/kr3gt
                http://tinyurl.com/l7oqh
                steve blake...roaming the Texas Panhandle in my trusty Champ pickup
                http://tinyurl.com/kr3gt

                Comment


                • #9
                  [)]I have always wondered how those McKinnon Studes performed in comparison to 289 powered cars?[)]

                  steve blake
                  http://tinyurl.com/kr3gt
                  http://tinyurl.com/l7oqh
                  steve blake...roaming the Texas Panhandle in my trusty Champ pickup
                  http://tinyurl.com/kr3gt

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    I never got much 'seat time' in a comparable Stude-Powered car to my '65, but I can say that she'll hold her own!!! Maybe not the quickest thing out there, but I just love having that 3.07~ it's got a top-end that has yet to be seen by me, lets just leave it at that... [:0]
                    I've often said that if I ever get more then the 'stock' 283/2brl w/ 2 1/4" single exhaust I'd be in for a surprise, as would others!!!

                    After more then 15 years of daily use, I've come to trust that car more then I care to think about anymore!!!

                    StudeDave [8D]
                    StudeDave '57
                    US Navy (retired)

                    3rd Generation Stude owner/driver
                    SDC Member since 1985

                    past President
                    Whatcom County Chapter SDC
                    San Diego Chapter SDC

                    past Vice President
                    San Diego Chapter SDC
                    North Florida Chapter SDC

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      I never got much 'seat time' in a comparable Stude-Powered car to my '65, but I can say that she'll hold her own!!! Maybe not the quickest thing out there, but I just love having that 3.07~ it's got a top-end that has yet to be seen by me, lets just leave it at that... [:0]
                      I've often said that if I ever get more then the 'stock' 283/2brl w/ 2 1/4" single exhaust I'd be in for a surprise, as would others!!!

                      After more then 15 years of daily use, I've come to trust that car more then I care to think about anymore!!!

                      StudeDave [8D]
                      StudeDave '57
                      US Navy (retired)

                      3rd Generation Stude owner/driver
                      SDC Member since 1985

                      past President
                      Whatcom County Chapter SDC
                      San Diego Chapter SDC

                      past Vice President
                      San Diego Chapter SDC
                      North Florida Chapter SDC

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Well Steve it's your lucky day! All you have do do is read the Portland Oregon International Meet (unofficial) drag race results in Turning Wheels Nov.'93 Pg. 33-34 to find that in the simi-finals I was able to beat StudeDave57's '65 Cruiser 283 2brl. Auto. 3.07 (and break-out for the loss[xx(]) with my very close weight, same gearing, trans. etc. '64 Daytona 259 2brl. 2dr. Hardtop (18.73-73.8 mph)! Actually they were pretty much neck-n-neck, but a comparably equipped 289 could easily have smoked that 195 HP 283 with 210 or 225 HP and 305ft.lbs. of torque! Anyway, that left Dave as the Bracket "A" Finals winner! [^]

                        Mike (hotwheels63R2) in his Tan 289 2brl. Overdrive powered '61 Lark 2dr. Sedan took runner-up in the Race finals in Class "B" against a 12 sec. '53 coupe (350 Chev). They divided us into 2 groups A & B to speed things along and create the exciting "Finals" which I am proud to say, both of my son's were in! Oh! Mike's car turned 17.4-78.5 mph with really bad 3 on the tree, worn out shift linkage. [^]

                        And; on the back cover Mike's car is lined up in row one #3 spot, Dave's car is in row two #1 spot, mine is in row one #8 spot for a run (where I was paired with the "Blu By You" Chev. 350 '53 C) Mike and I talk to Mike Myer next to his Blackcherry Avanti!

                        quote:Originally posted by arkiejazz

                        [b][i][)]I have always wondered how those McKinnon Studes performed in comparison to 289 powered cars?
                        StudeRich
                        Studebakers Northwest
                        Ferndale, WA
                        StudeRich
                        Second Generation Stude Driver,
                        Proud '54 Starliner Owner

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Well Steve it's your lucky day! All you have do do is read the Portland Oregon International Meet (unofficial) drag race results in Turning Wheels Nov.'93 Pg. 33-34 to find that in the simi-finals I was able to beat StudeDave57's '65 Cruiser 283 2brl. Auto. 3.07 (and break-out for the loss[xx(]) with my very close weight, same gearing, trans. etc. '64 Daytona 259 2brl. 2dr. Hardtop (18.73-73.8 mph)! Actually they were pretty much neck-n-neck, but a comparably equipped 289 could easily have smoked that 195 HP 283 with 210 or 225 HP and 305ft.lbs. of torque! Anyway, that left Dave as the Bracket "A" Finals winner! [^]

                          Mike (hotwheels63R2) in his Tan 289 2brl. Overdrive powered '61 Lark 2dr. Sedan took runner-up in the Race finals in Class "B" against a 12 sec. '53 coupe (350 Chev). They divided us into 2 groups A & B to speed things along and create the exciting "Finals" which I am proud to say, both of my son's were in! Oh! Mike's car turned 17.4-78.5 mph with really bad 3 on the tree, worn out shift linkage. [^]

                          And; on the back cover Mike's car is lined up in row one #3 spot, Dave's car is in row two #1 spot, mine is in row one #8 spot for a run (where I was paired with the "Blu By You" Chev. 350 '53 C) Mike and I talk to Mike Myer next to his Blackcherry Avanti!

                          quote:Originally posted by arkiejazz

                          [b][i][)]I have always wondered how those McKinnon Studes performed in comparison to 289 powered cars?
                          StudeRich
                          Studebakers Northwest
                          Ferndale, WA
                          StudeRich
                          Second Generation Stude Driver,
                          Proud '54 Starliner Owner

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            quote:Originally posted by StudeRich

                            Well Steve it's your lucky day! All you have do do is read the Portland Oregon International Meet (unofficial) drag race results in Turning Wheels Nov.'93 Pg. 33-34 to find that in the simi-finals I was able to beat StudeDave's '65 Cruiser 283 Auto. 3.07 (and break-out for the loss[xx(]) with my very close weight, same gearing, trans. etc. '64 Daytona 259 2brl. 2dr. Hardtop (18.73-73.8 mph)! Actually they were pretty much neck-n-neck, but a comparably equipped 289 could easily have smoked that 195 HP 283 with 210 or 225 HP and 305ft.lbs. of torque! That left Dave as the Bracket "A" Finals winner! [^]

                            Mike in his Tan 289 2brl. Overdrive powered '61 Lark 2dr. Sedan to take runner-up in the Race finals in Class "B". They divided us into 2 groups A & B to speed things along and create the exciting "Finals" which I am proud to say, both of my son's were in! Oh! Mike's car turned 17.4-78.5 mph with really bad 3 on the tree, worn out shift linkage. [^]

                            And; on the back cover Mike's car is lined up in row one #3 spot, Dave's car is in row two #1 spot, mine is in row one #8 spot for a run where I was paired with BluBuyue(sp)big block Chev. '53 C while Mike and I talk to Mike Meyer next to his Avanti!

                            quote:Originally posted by arkiejazz

                            [b][i][)]I have always wondered how those McKinnon Studes performed in comparison to 289 powered cars?
                            StudeRich
                            Studebakers Northwest
                            Ferndale, WA
                            [)]Well, I wouldn't want to be racing....not that there's anything wrong with it....just not for me.....I've just always feared that driving a McKinnon Stude wouldn't feel like driving a Studebaker....no offense intended toward ANYONE. The '66's are great looking cars, and the '65's are a virtual visual remake of the '64's, but I've never driven either one.[)]

                            steve blake
                            http://tinyurl.com/kr3gt
                            http://tinyurl.com/l7oqh
                            steve blake...roaming the Texas Panhandle in my trusty Champ pickup
                            http://tinyurl.com/kr3gt

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              quote:Originally posted by StudeRich

                              Well Steve it's your lucky day! All you have do do is read the Portland Oregon International Meet (unofficial) drag race results in Turning Wheels Nov.'93 Pg. 33-34 to find that in the simi-finals I was able to beat StudeDave's '65 Cruiser 283 Auto. 3.07 (and break-out for the loss[xx(]) with my very close weight, same gearing, trans. etc. '64 Daytona 259 2brl. 2dr. Hardtop (18.73-73.8 mph)! Actually they were pretty much neck-n-neck, but a comparably equipped 289 could easily have smoked that 195 HP 283 with 210 or 225 HP and 305ft.lbs. of torque! That left Dave as the Bracket "A" Finals winner! [^]

                              Mike in his Tan 289 2brl. Overdrive powered '61 Lark 2dr. Sedan to take runner-up in the Race finals in Class "B". They divided us into 2 groups A & B to speed things along and create the exciting "Finals" which I am proud to say, both of my son's were in! Oh! Mike's car turned 17.4-78.5 mph with really bad 3 on the tree, worn out shift linkage. [^]

                              And; on the back cover Mike's car is lined up in row one #3 spot, Dave's car is in row two #1 spot, mine is in row one #8 spot for a run where I was paired with BluBuyue(sp)big block Chev. '53 C while Mike and I talk to Mike Meyer next to his Avanti!

                              quote:Originally posted by arkiejazz

                              [b][i][)]I have always wondered how those McKinnon Studes performed in comparison to 289 powered cars?
                              StudeRich
                              Studebakers Northwest
                              Ferndale, WA
                              [)]Well, I wouldn't want to be racing....not that there's anything wrong with it....just not for me.....I've just always feared that driving a McKinnon Stude wouldn't feel like driving a Studebaker....no offense intended toward ANYONE. The '66's are great looking cars, and the '65's are a virtual visual remake of the '64's, but I've never driven either one.[)]

                              steve blake
                              http://tinyurl.com/kr3gt
                              http://tinyurl.com/l7oqh
                              steve blake...roaming the Texas Panhandle in my trusty Champ pickup
                              http://tinyurl.com/kr3gt

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X