Besides this forum one of my other favorites on the internet is TheTruthAboutCars.com, where the fortunes of Ford Motor Company and General Motors have been active fodder for pundits and enthusiasts who post as we do here on this forum. Ford in particular has been the subject of intense scrutiny as its future as a full line automaker seems to now hang in the balance. Ford's biggest problems are (1) Labor (2) Aging product line and (3)Money. Do these three problems sound at all familiar Studebaker people? In 2006 Ford had not taken a hard strike in a generation. In 1963 Studebaker hadn't either. In 2006 Ford lots are full of aging Crown Vics, unsalable SUVs and woebegone Focuses. In 1963 dealer lots and Studebaker inventory were plum full of unsold and presumably unloved Larks, Hawks and aging trucks. Then there's the money thing...without sufficient funds new product development lagged. Studebaker in 1963 had cars whose underpinnings dated to 1953 and earlier. In 2006 Ford isn't doing much better. Many parts of the Crown Vic go waaaaay back to the big downsizing of LTD in 1979!! In 1963 workers rubbed their eyes in disbelief. Never, they thought, could something as big as Studebaker call it quits in South Bend. I'm afraid workers and even auto pundits in 2006 aren't thinking the same thing about Ford.
Will Fords someday soon join the ranks of Studebakers at local Orphan Car Shows?
Studedude1961
--1963 Cruiser
Will Fords someday soon join the ranks of Studebakers at local Orphan Car Shows?
Studedude1961
--1963 Cruiser
Comment