Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

HOT ROD LARK

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • s1b
    replied
    Love it! At first I thought it was some a later pic of the Flintstone Flyer II. After looking at some pics, I'm not sure.

    Orlando FLA

    Leave a comment:


  • studegary
    replied
    quote:Originally posted by Gunslinger

    It's definitely a '66-'67 Charger. I owned two of the flatbacks several years back. Money pits of the deepest kind, but I will say the Mopar big blocks, 4-speed trannies and rears were bulletproof.



    I have experience with a 1966 Charger that I ordered new. In nine years and 150K miles, the only repair (non-wear like tires) was a new water pump ($9) at 99K miles because the original was starting to seep. I saw the car a couple of owners later and the guy said that it ran gret for 80K miles (it had at least 180K miles then). I lost track of the car after that.


    Gary L.
    Wappinger, NY

    SDC member since 1968
    Studebaker enthusiast much longer

    Leave a comment:


  • 52-fan
    replied
    The scoop must be attached by some sort of pedestal to the hood. There does not appear to be a hole around the scoop.

    "In the heart of Arkansas."
    1952 Champion Starlight w/overdrive. Searcy, Arkansas

    Leave a comment:


  • Eugene
    replied
    LOVE IT

    Leave a comment:


  • COMMANDERPINK1
    replied
    Im looking at the Stude and is the air scoop on the hood look like its fasten to the hood or carb? I just cant see any cut out of the hood.

    Tom

    Leave a comment:


  • laughinlark
    replied
    Cool pic, Love the Gasser Larks. [8D]

    Gordon

    Leave a comment:


  • Gunslinger
    replied
    It's definitely a '66-'67 Charger. I owned two of the flatbacks several years back. Money pits of the deepest kind, but I will say the Mopar big blocks, 4-speed trannies and rears were bulletproof.




    Poet...Mystic...Soldier of Fortune. As always...self-absorbed, adversarial, cocky and in general a malcontent.

    Leave a comment:


  • Guido
    replied
    quote:Originally posted by bezhawk

    I'd say maybe l966? If that is a Charger in the background.
    if it's a Marlin 65?
    A bigger screen makes all the difference in the world! In looking at it now I would agree that this is a '66 Charger as the Marlin had more of a rounded roof, taller front fenders and I can clearly see the "crease" down the side. Good eye!

    Guido Salvage - "Where rust is beautiful" and real Studebaker horsepower lives

    See pictures here: http://community.webshots.com/user/GuidoSalvage

    Hiding and preserving Studebakers in Richmond, Goochland & Louisa, Va.

    Leave a comment:


  • bezhawk
    replied
    I'd say maybe l966? If that is a Charger in the background.
    if it's a Marlin 65?

    Leave a comment:


  • Guido
    replied
    At first glance one would think this picture was shot when the Lark was almost new until you see the Marlin in the background.

    Guido Salvage - "Where rust is beautiful" and real Studebaker horsepower lives

    See pictures here: http://community.webshots.com/user/GuidoSalvage

    Hiding and preserving Studebakers in Richmond, Goochland & Louisa, Va.

    Leave a comment:


  • jallen
    replied
    Looks so good it FEELS good[8D]

    Leave a comment:


  • Chris Pile
    replied
    OK - do a burnout!

    Chris Pile
    http://midwaystudebakers.tripod.com/

    Leave a comment:


  • silverhawk
    replied
    I dig it! That is sweet!

    Dylan Wills
    [IMG][/IMG]
    '61 lark deluxe 4 door wagon

    Leave a comment:


  • BRUCESTUDE
    started a topic HOT ROD LARK

    HOT ROD LARK

    DIG THIS:[8D]
Working...
X