Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Photo help requested

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Dick Steinkamp
    replied
    quote:Originally posted by hotwheels63r2
    Do I get extra credit if I can identify the location? he he he...
    MIKE
    That would be cheating, Mike

    http://www.co.whatcom.wa.us/parks/hovander/hovander.jsp


    Dick Steinkamp
    Bellingham, WA

    Leave a comment:


  • Dick Steinkamp
    replied
    quote:Originally posted by hotwheels63r2
    Do I get extra credit if I can identify the location? he he he...
    MIKE
    That would be cheating, Mike

    http://www.co.whatcom.wa.us/parks/hovander/hovander.jsp


    Dick Steinkamp
    Bellingham, WA

    Leave a comment:


  • Roscomacaw
    replied
    29 is dynamic and in my mind would be a grabber of a break with the traditional 3/4 view shots that are the "norm". The M-series grille is unmistakeable and I like the less-than-perfect patina of the truck being evident.
    I like 38 too. Frankly, any of the shots with the clutter (distraction, if you will) of the barn or other "stuff" steals the show.[^]

    Miscreant adrift in
    the BerStuda Triangle


    1957 Transtar 1/2ton
    1960 Larkvertible V8
    1958 Provincial wagon
    1953 Commander coupe

    Leave a comment:


  • Roscomacaw
    replied
    29 is dynamic and in my mind would be a grabber of a break with the traditional 3/4 view shots that are the "norm". The M-series grille is unmistakeable and I like the less-than-perfect patina of the truck being evident.
    I like 38 too. Frankly, any of the shots with the clutter (distraction, if you will) of the barn or other "stuff" steals the show.[^]

    Miscreant adrift in
    the BerStuda Triangle


    1957 Transtar 1/2ton
    1960 Larkvertible V8
    1958 Provincial wagon
    1953 Commander coupe

    Leave a comment:


  • Dick Steinkamp
    replied
    Thanks guys...great input. Some agreement even .

    Thanks, Ron for the critiques. I appreciate the help and agree with all your comments. (also, it's not my place...unfortunately...it's a county park, restored farm, about 5 miles from my house. It is a beautiful setting, especially since the mountain and the peacocks decided to show them selves [8D])

    I ran these by my son who does a great job with a camera. He feels they might not be high enough res for the contest. I'll check on that. Worse case, I'll have to have another photo session (durn it )

    Thanks a again for your help. It was fun!


    Dick Steinkamp
    Bellingham, WA

    Leave a comment:


  • Dick Steinkamp
    replied
    Thanks guys...great input. Some agreement even .

    Thanks, Ron for the critiques. I appreciate the help and agree with all your comments. (also, it's not my place...unfortunately...it's a county park, restored farm, about 5 miles from my house. It is a beautiful setting, especially since the mountain and the peacocks decided to show them selves [8D])

    I ran these by my son who does a great job with a camera. He feels they might not be high enough res for the contest. I'll check on that. Worse case, I'll have to have another photo session (durn it )

    Thanks a again for your help. It was fun!


    Dick Steinkamp
    Bellingham, WA

    Leave a comment:


  • studeclunker
    replied
    what with the setting, you almost can't go wrong with this beautiful truck. Here's my curtique of the following shots;

    38, D.N.P.[8D] NICE angle, dramatic shot!

    11, Without the lights this excellent shot has no life. Turning the lights on would make all the difference

    50, interesting scenery, nice balanced shot.

    51, Nice balanced shot.

    35-37, all nice shots, the angle was bland.

    45-46, the barn looks like a hat. Not a complementary shot.

    15, Almost perfect for a front-on shot. Lights on would have improved it.

    59, nicely centered. Would have benefited from lights being on. Good background.

    65-66, Too low in frame. Cropping might help.

    68, Good shot, nice dramatic angle.

    69, 76-77, Nice shot spoiled by a poor background.

    Beautiful Peacock and hens. You have a truely beautiful place. I love the barn.


    Lotsa Larks!
    K.I.S.S. Keep It Simple Studebaker!
    Ron Smith

    Leave a comment:


  • studeclunker
    replied
    what with the setting, you almost can't go wrong with this beautiful truck. Here's my curtique of the following shots;

    38, D.N.P.[8D] NICE angle, dramatic shot!

    11, Without the lights this excellent shot has no life. Turning the lights on would make all the difference

    50, interesting scenery, nice balanced shot.

    51, Nice balanced shot.

    35-37, all nice shots, the angle was bland.

    45-46, the barn looks like a hat. Not a complementary shot.

    15, Almost perfect for a front-on shot. Lights on would have improved it.

    59, nicely centered. Would have benefited from lights being on. Good background.

    65-66, Too low in frame. Cropping might help.

    68, Good shot, nice dramatic angle.

    69, 76-77, Nice shot spoiled by a poor background.

    Beautiful Peacock and hens. You have a truely beautiful place. I love the barn.


    Lotsa Larks!
    K.I.S.S. Keep It Simple Studebaker!
    Ron Smith

    Leave a comment:


  • bams50
    replied
    Don't ask me, I'm on dial-up [B)]

    Robert K. Andrews Owner- IoMT (Island of Misfit Toys!)
    Parish, central NY 13131
    http://www.cardomain.com/ride/2358680/1

    Leave a comment:


  • bams50
    replied
    Don't ask me, I'm on dial-up [B)]

    Robert K. Andrews Owner- IoMT (Island of Misfit Toys!)
    Parish, central NY 13131
    http://www.cardomain.com/ride/2358680/1

    Leave a comment:


  • arkiejazz
    replied
    I like 0047. How can you beat that barn backdrop and the peafowl beside the old M? The only thing that could make it better is if you had a few bales of hay to load on the bed.

    steve blake
    http://tinyurl.com/kr3gt
    http://tinyurl.com/l7oqh

    Leave a comment:


  • arkiejazz
    replied
    I like 0047. How can you beat that barn backdrop and the peafowl beside the old M? The only thing that could make it better is if you had a few bales of hay to load on the bed.

    steve blake
    http://tinyurl.com/kr3gt
    http://tinyurl.com/l7oqh

    Leave a comment:


  • studelark
    replied
    Dick; My choices, in additon to the photo in your main post, are # 0015, 0036, 0059, and 0077. Great set of pix.

    Frank Drumheller

    Leave a comment:


  • studelark
    replied
    Dick; My choices, in additon to the photo in your main post, are # 0015, 0036, 0059, and 0077. Great set of pix.

    Frank Drumheller

    Leave a comment:


  • Swifster
    replied
    Check out an article from Popular Hot Rodding. They show how to take profession style photographs for publication, as well as critiquing submissions to the magazine. Personally, I like 018.

    http://www.popularhotrodding.com/fea...photo_contest/

    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Tom - Lakeland, FL

    1964 Studebaker Daytona



    Michigan Speed - www.michiganspeed.com
    Club Hot Rod - www.clubhotrod.com
    LS1 Tech - www.ls1tech.com

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X