Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Wig wag

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    I want two of them for my Stude’s!!

    Comment


    • #17
      Originally posted by tim333 View Post
      I want two of them for my Stude’s!!
      Happy hunters have deep pockets!
      "All attempts to 'rise above the issue' are simply an excuse to avoid it profitably." --Dick Gregory

      Brad Johnson, SDC since 1975, ASC since 1990
      Pine Grove Mills, Pa.
      sigpic'33 Rockne 10, '51 Commander Starlight, '53 Commander Starlight "Désirée"

      Comment


      • #18
        Here are a set for sale, not Studebaker scripted, but the OEM Dua-Safe units: https://forums.aaca.org/topic/322418...ag-taillights/

        Craig

        Comment


        • #19
          Originally posted by Mike Van Veghten View Post
          Not so much is Google a lost art...when people post information about obscure parts or information...they NEED to provide just a LITTLE...information..!
          People have other things going on than to search for something that SHOULD have been provided by the original poster.

          I for one attempt to do this...ain't that difficult.

          Mike
          for one i didn't post INFORMATION i was after information so WHAT LITTLE information SHOULD or COULD i of provided

          Comment


          • #20
            so i wish to ask now does anyone have any information on what grease was used on the inside of these lights ???

            Comment


            • #21
              This would be a good project for those wanting to reproduce parts using a 3D printer. Might even be profitable.
              sigpic1966 Daytona (The First One)
              1950 Champion Convertible
              1950 Champion 4Dr
              1955 President 2 Dr Hardtop
              1957 Thunderbird

              Comment


              • #22
                Don't think so. There are at least 12 separate parts involved plus the two glass lens. The price to replicate just the barrel lens would be more than anyone would want to pay. Then of course you would have the expense of the plating etc.
                Richard Quinn
                Editor emeritus: Antique Studebaker Review

                Comment


                • #23
                  Originally posted by studeclunker View Post
                  these have to be one of the funniest auto-accessories ever made!
                  I suppose today, it may be, but back then, railroad crossings used a similar swinging, or semaphore signalling device, so it may not have appeared 'funny' when new.


                  Craig

                  Comment

                  Working...
                  X