Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

56 hood repo medellion

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • KGlowacky
    replied
    OK Biggs, you're correct! Thanks for the clairification Studerich. Mine are plastic.

    Leave a comment:


  • KGlowacky
    replied
    OK Biggs, you're correct! Thanks for the clairification Studerich. Mine are plastic.

    Leave a comment:


  • hank63
    replied
    The linguist strikes again

    Leave a comment:


  • hank63
    replied
    The linguist strikes again

    Leave a comment:


  • Roscomacaw
    replied
    Ken asks..."So I will need two different keys no matter what? Bare with me,"

    Ken, I will bear with you. I don't have a problem with that proposition. But "bare" with you, I will not. Besides - Me - bare - that's not something anyone here wants to see.[xx(]

    Miscreant adrift in
    the BerStuda Triangle


    1957 Transtar 1/2ton
    1960 Larkvertible V8
    1958 Provincial wagon
    1953 Commander coupe

    Leave a comment:


  • Roscomacaw
    replied
    Ken asks..."So I will need two different keys no matter what? Bare with me,"

    Ken, I will bear with you. I don't have a problem with that proposition. But "bare" with you, I will not. Besides - Me - bare - that's not something anyone here wants to see.[xx(]

    Miscreant adrift in
    the BerStuda Triangle


    1957 Transtar 1/2ton
    1960 Larkvertible V8
    1958 Provincial wagon
    1953 Commander coupe

    Leave a comment:


  • StudeRich
    replied
    They will not be the same between 289509 and 1314307, the 289509 is all metal, as the original was, no plastic! [:0]

    quote:Originally posted by KGlowacky


    Just went and got both org. emblems. they are the same. And they look like Si #289509 emblem which they state as 50-51 land cruiser. Si does NOT show a picture of 1314307 so they may also look the same.
    StudeRich
    Studebakers Northwest
    Ferndale, WA

    Leave a comment:


  • StudeRich
    replied
    They will not be the same between 289509 and 1314307, the 289509 is all metal, as the original was, no plastic! [:0]

    quote:Originally posted by KGlowacky


    Just went and got both org. emblems. they are the same. And they look like Si #289509 emblem which they state as 50-51 land cruiser. Si does NOT show a picture of 1314307 so they may also look the same.
    StudeRich
    Studebakers Northwest
    Ferndale, WA

    Leave a comment:


  • JDP
    replied
    The cheap one was made by Dan Webber, hand painted with tin foil for the silver. Nice enough for a driver, but not for show.

    JDP/Maryland
    63 R2 SuperHawk (Caesar)
    spent to date $54664,75
    64 R2 GT (Sid)
    spent to date $62,439.30
    63 Lark 2 door
    51 Commander
    39 Coupe express
    39 Coupe express (rod)

    Leave a comment:


  • JDP
    replied
    The cheap one was made by Dan Webber, hand painted with tin foil for the silver. Nice enough for a driver, but not for show.

    JDP/Maryland
    63 R2 SuperHawk (Caesar)
    spent to date $54664,75
    64 R2 GT (Sid)
    spent to date $62,439.30
    63 Lark 2 door
    51 Commander
    39 Coupe express
    39 Coupe express (rod)

    Leave a comment:


  • bondobilly
    replied
    There WERE two versions available a bunch years ago, before I took ill. One sold at Reedsville for $25 a pop and the other version was about $75 or more at the time. I think I have a NOS one in my collection downstairs that I bought from the A&M Garage in the late 80's.

    I do not know about any color issues, but on the less expensive one the word Studebaker was not centered and the blck paint in the letters was fuzzy.

    Leave a comment:


  • bondobilly
    replied
    There WERE two versions available a bunch years ago, before I took ill. One sold at Reedsville for $25 a pop and the other version was about $75 or more at the time. I think I have a NOS one in my collection downstairs that I bought from the A&M Garage in the late 80's.

    I do not know about any color issues, but on the less expensive one the word Studebaker was not centered and the blck paint in the letters was fuzzy.

    Leave a comment:


  • KGlowacky
    replied
    The emblems I refer to are for the hood and tailgate. SI says the hawk grill and the sedan hoods are the same. My tailgate matches the hood.
    Just went and got both org. emblems. they are the same. And they look like Si #289509 emblem which they state as 50-51 land cruiser. Si does NOT show a picture of 1314307 so they may also look the same.

    Leave a comment:


  • KGlowacky
    replied
    The emblems I refer to are for the hood and tailgate. SI says the hawk grill and the sedan hoods are the same. My tailgate matches the hood.
    Just went and got both org. emblems. they are the same. And they look like Si #289509 emblem which they state as 50-51 land cruiser. Si does NOT show a picture of 1314307 so they may also look the same.

    Leave a comment:


  • JDP
    replied
    That's odd, I've only used the ones that fit in the trunk bezel, and they fit and looked fine. Maybe the red was off, but I wasn't anal enough to notice it.

    JDP/Maryland
    63 R2 SuperHawk (Caesar)
    spent to date $54664,75
    64 R2 GT (Sid)
    spent to date $62,439.30
    63 Lark 2 door
    51 Commander
    39 Coupe express
    39 Coupe express (rod)

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X