Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Old Studebaker building - New Studebaker National Museum building???
Collapse
X
-
Not sure I understand - the article that comes up when you click on the link says nothing about the Studebaker National Museum.Paul
Winston-Salem, NC
Visit The Studebaker Skytop Registry website at: www.studebakerskytop.com
Check out my YouTube channel here: https://www.youtube.com/user/r1lark
Comment
-
Easy, guys: Jim's OP says "food for thought," implying simple daydreaming. Nothing wrong with that, but nobody is considering moving The Studebaker National Museum!
Let's not let our Forum Imaginations run wild and turn fiction into fact ...not that it has ever been done here previously, of course. BPWe've got to quit saying, "How stupid can you be?" Too many people are taking it as a challenge.
G. K. Chesterton: This triangle of truisms, of father, mother, and child, cannot be destroyed; it can only destroy those civilizations which disregard it.
Comment
-
Originally posted by studeclunker View PostI don't understand. Why the roll-eyes? This is good news!
So Ron, considering the above do you now know why this was inserted in the first post of this thread???Last edited by 56Golden; 08-03-2016, 07:54 PM.
Comment
-
Went to google Maps to see what the building actually looks like currently. That is one HUGE building! I also tried to do a screen capture and am unable to do so. All the same, I can see where it would be a nice place just with new more modern windows, even without the fancy-schmancy additions the developer wants to add on.
I still don't get the roll-eyes. However maybe a bit. You see, I don't know all the back-story behind all of this. All the same, I don't see where they would give over even one full floor, let alone half the building, for the museum. It would be nice though if the museum could be located on the bottom floor of the structure. Problem is, we already have a very nice museum and I wonder if bigger is better in this case. Just the bottom floor of building 84 would be several times larger than the current museum including increased costs to run and maintain. Not to mention the cost of moving everything in the current building. Sometimes it's better to be satisfied with the bird in hand than to risk losing it for two in the bush!
Home of the famous Mr. Ed!
K.I.S.S. Keep It Simple Studebaker!
Ron Smith
Where the heck is Fawn Lodge, CA?
Comment
-
Maybe I'm being naive, but all this looks like things are moving in a very positive direction. The technical center in the old Studebaker assembly building looks like it will come to be. I'm very happy for the good folks in South Bend. Things are definately looking up.
Rog'59 Lark VI Regal Hardtop
Smithtown,NY
Recording Secretary, Long Island Studebaker Club
Comment
-
Maybe I'm the one being naïve, but why would anyone think that after a climate-controlled building was put up expressly for the Studebaker National Museum only eleven years ago, someone would now be talking about moving it?Bill Pressler
Kent, OH
(formerly Greenville, PA)
Currently owned: 1966 Cruiser, Timberline Turquoise, 26K miles
Formerly owned: 1963 Lark Daytona Skytop R1, Ermine White
1964 Daytona Hardtop, Strato Blue
1966 Daytona Sports Sedan, Niagara Blue Mist
All are in Australia now
Comment
-
Bob Palma already reminded us that Jim's initial post was simply "food for thought". No one here has indicated any move is being contemplated. But I can add my thoughts to the plate.
The renovations and upgrade to Ivy Tower are being financed with an eye to attracting business and industry. Once a building of that size is ready for occupancy I would suspect all tenants would be encouraged, and the City of South Bend might well prefer to vacate the current museum rather than have vacant space in the new. Reiterating, that is just a thought. We have an outstanding museum as it is, where it is. If the region and traffic grows, the museum should grow with it. And where better?Brad Johnson,
SDC since 1975, ASC since 1990
Pine Grove Mills, Pa.
'33 Rockne 10, '51 Commander Starlight. '53 Commander Starlight
'56 Sky Hawk in process
Comment
-
Originally posted by Bill Pressler View PostMaybe I'm the one being naïve, but why would anyone think that after a climate-controlled building was put up expressly for the Studebaker National Museum only eleven years ago, someone would now be talking about moving it?
Also take a look at this: http://www.southbendtribune.com/news...86cc3a71e.html
Comment
-
Originally posted by 56Golden View PostBill, people will be living and working in "Building 84" (a.k.a. Ivy Tower in the new "Renaissance District" of South Bend) ...so why in the world would it not also be "climate controlled"??? BTW; I just ordered my 2017 SDC International Meet official T-shirt from the Studebaker National Museum. You might want to be sitting down when you see what is boldly pictured on the front of it!!! Check it out here: http://www.studebakermuseum.org/stor...rt-gray_00983/
Also take a look at this: http://www.southbendtribune.com/news...86cc3a71e.htmlMike - Assistant Editor, Turning Wheels
Fort Worth, TX
Comment
-
Originally posted by rockne10 View PostWe have an outstanding museum as it is, where it is. If the region and traffic grows, the museum should grow with it. And where better?Paul
Winston-Salem, NC
Visit The Studebaker Skytop Registry website at: www.studebakerskytop.com
Check out my YouTube channel here: https://www.youtube.com/user/r1lark
Comment
Comment