Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Former Studebaker employee, UAW leader celebrates 90th birthday
Collapse
X
-
His photo is included on the murals Local 5 Union Hall: http://forum.studebakerdriversclub.c...ighlight=MURAL
Craig
Comment
-
Originally posted by lschuc View PostSOUTH BEND, Ind. -- A man who has dedicated nine decades of life to helping others celebrated a big birthday Thursday. Les Fox turned 90.
Fox is a former Studebaker employee who became an advocate for the unemployed and under-served after the plant closed.
What the story doesn't say is that Lester Fox was in charge of UAW Local 5 in South Bend during some of Studebaker's harshest strikes in the late 1950s and 1960s.
If Lester Fox had really been interested in the [potentially] unemployed, he would have encouraged Studebaker's hourly workers to stay on the job when Egbert had the ball rolling their way in the spring of 1962, instead of strangling production at a time when dealers really needed more good-selling '62 Larks and newly-restyled Hawks.
(Aren't people normally canonized after they die?) BPLast edited by BobPalma; 08-08-2014, 04:51 AM.We've got to quit saying, "How stupid can you be?" Too many people are taking it as a challenge.
G. K. Chesterton: This triangle of truisms, of father, mother, and child, cannot be destroyed; it can only destroy those civilizations which disregard it.
Comment
-
Originally posted by BobPalma View PostThanks for that reminder, Lew (seriously).
If Lester Fox had really been interested in the [potentially] unemployed, he would have encouraged Studebaker's hourly workers to stay on the job when Egbert had the ball rolling their way in the spring of 1962, instead of strangling production at a time when dealers really needed more good-selling '62 Larks and newly-restyled Hawks.
(Aren't people normally canonized after they die?) BPLast edited by nels; 08-12-2014, 05:06 AM.
Comment
-
Perhaps the powers that be in New York had a hand in seeing the strike crippled the automotive sector of the corporation? After all they wanted out of auto manufacturing. Bankers control the purse string, hence whatever went on in the corporation.Bez Auto Alchemy
573-318-8948
http://bezautoalchemy.com
"Don't believe every internet quote" Abe Lincoln
Comment
-
Originally posted by bezhawk View PostPerhaps the powers that be in New York had a hand in seeing the strike crippled the automotive sector of the corporation? After all they wanted out of auto manufacturing. Bankers control the purse string, hence whatever went on in the corporation.
Comment
-
Originally posted by nels View PostI often thought that Fox actually held the hand that would have given Studebaker another chance.
This may take a minute, but I think it needs to be said about that early 1962 strike that crippled production at a critical time in the Automotive Division's last years.
From the January 15, 1962 edition of Newsweek, under the headline, Showdown at South Bend.
(All of the following in dark blue is an exact quote from the article; no editing):
The company's demands:
1. That total relief time be cut from the present 39 minutes to 25. (General Motors gives 24 minutes.)
2. That vacation pay be calculated on straight-time wages, the usual method, instead of total pay, as at present.
3. That overtime is paid only after five days of straight time in a single work week, the same as in other auto companies, instead of the present schedule of time-and-a-half for all Saturday work and double time for all Sunday work.
4. That costly shift premiums be lowered.
UAW-CIO Regional Director Raymond Berndt branded S-P's demands, "the most dishonest I have ever witnessed."
Egbert's retort, "What's dishonest about trying to become competitive? He added, "We've been at fault in not allowing them [the workers] to know the facts...we must adjust back to the proper competitive position. They may not agree with me, but I've got to face my conscience."
The January 6, 1962 issue of Business Week had already published the following in a similar article:
"[Proposed contract terms] included wage concessions for employees, including an annual improvement factor raise of 2.5%, or a minimum of 6 cents per hour, but with 1.5 cents of the increase held to offset higher pension costs, and an additional 1 cent per hour as a cost-of-living increase."
Well, there you have it.
Barely 22 months later, the UAW's bone-headedness in not listening to Egbert had not only contributed to Egbert's stomach cancer, subsequent forced resignation, and the ultimately-shortened life of a good man, but had helped insure that Christmas 1963 would be somewhat less than merry in South Bend for the thousands of UAW members who had believed their "leaders," rather than those trying to keep Studebaker production lines profitable and competitive in South Bend.
As Sir Winston Churchill said in a speech to The House of Commons on May 17, 1916: "[The] truth is incontrovertible. Panic may resent it, ignorance may deride it, malice may distort it, but there it is."
And here we are almost 100 years later. Odd how history repeats itself, isn't it? BPWe've got to quit saying, "How stupid can you be?" Too many people are taking it as a challenge.
G. K. Chesterton: This triangle of truisms, of father, mother, and child, cannot be destroyed; it can only destroy those civilizations which disregard it.
Comment
-
Originally posted by bezhawk View PostPerhaps the powers that be in New York had a hand in seeing the strike crippled the automotive sector of the corporation? After all they wanted out of auto manufacturing. Bankers control the purse string, hence whatever went on in the corporation.
There is every possibility that those Board Members who wanted out of the automobile business when Egbert was hired (which wasn't all of them, of course, or it would have happened in 1961), would have been crying crocodile tears at the strike's potential of driving the final nails in the Automotive Division's coffin. BPWe've got to quit saying, "How stupid can you be?" Too many people are taking it as a challenge.
G. K. Chesterton: This triangle of truisms, of father, mother, and child, cannot be destroyed; it can only destroy those civilizations which disregard it.
Comment
-
Originally posted by BobPalma View PostRight, Brad: You are also onto something, there.
There is every possibility that those Board Members who wanted out of the automobile business when Egbert was hired (which wasn't all of them, of course, or it would have happened in 1961), would have been crying crocodile tears at the strike's potential of driving the final nails in the Automotive Division's coffin. BP
Stu Chapman
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by nels View PostI know Nixon was part of the split up but what/how did he hinder things??
If you have a copy, check out Page 57 and others, as referenced in the Index. But Page 57 is the bulk of it.
(It was when Nixon was acting as an attorney, not as President or Vice President of The United States.) BPWe've got to quit saying, "How stupid can you be?" Too many people are taking it as a challenge.
G. K. Chesterton: This triangle of truisms, of father, mother, and child, cannot be destroyed; it can only destroy those civilizations which disregard it.
Comment
-
Originally posted by BobPalma View PostNels: I don't know the extent to which Stu wants to answer your question here, but he well answers it in his book, My Father the Car.
If you have a copy, check out Page 57 and others, as referenced in the Index. But Page 57 is the bulk of it.
(It was when Nixon was acting as an attorney, not as President or Vice President of The United States.) BP
Stu Chapman
Comment
Comment