Undoubtedly a church in South Bend / Mishawaka, but which one? (I don't know; I'm asking...):
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
South Benders: Where was this photo taken?
Collapse
X
-
South Benders: Where was this photo taken?
We've got to quit saying, "How stupid can you be?" Too many people are taking it as a challenge.
G. K. Chesterton: This triangle of truisms, of father, mother, and child, cannot be destroyed; it can only destroy those civilizations which disregard it.Tags: None
-
It's not St. Pauls. The doors in the photograph don't match those on St. Pauls. See: http://stpaulsmemorial.com/Mark L
Comment
-
As for the car, it just wasn't in the original picture. Its too well lite. The reflections look too studio, and the interior is lighted as well. The brides reflection is brushed into the hood, but the standing wedding
photographer is not brushed into the front bumper.And the cars shawdow is just too generic.Heck, I'm not even sure the people where there at the church either. But its a beautiful little lark.
Comment
-
There's one that's been sitting in my garage that I haven't driven in a while and I'd love to see it belong to someone who would drive it more, and yes it's a factory 289.
Send me an email if interested...Dan Peterson
Montpelier, VT
1960 Lark V-8 Convertible
1960 Lark V-8 Convertible (parts car)
Comment
-
Originally posted by qsanford View PostThe first limosette! And with "Performabilty" to boot!Gary L.
Wappinger, NY
SDC member since 1968
Studebaker enthusiast much longer
Comment
-
Originally posted by studegary View PostCruisers were not limousettes (note correct spelling) until the 1963 model. The closest that the 1961 Cruiser came was being advertised as having limousine roominess.
Craig
Comment
Comment