This was in an article in the newspaper today based on what the ratings were for the cars in a 1957 Consumer Reports Magazine. It was by Larry Printz from The Virginian-Pilot.
Low priced ($2,253-$2631) 1st CHEVY 210- good power, prcise handling, good fuel econ, rattle free body
Last Studebaker Champion and Commander burdensome to drive and poorly built
Medium price($2,727-3,178) 1st Olds Rocket 88-well engineered/built, powerfu,l roomy, reliable
Last Studebaker President-burdensome to drive and poorly built
The authors conculsion was that the magazine proves the old saying about antique cars: What's popular new will be popular when it turns old.
I've never been a big fan of Consumer Reports but it was interesting to know their opinion of Studebakers at the time.
Ken
Low priced ($2,253-$2631) 1st CHEVY 210- good power, prcise handling, good fuel econ, rattle free body
Last Studebaker Champion and Commander burdensome to drive and poorly built
Medium price($2,727-3,178) 1st Olds Rocket 88-well engineered/built, powerfu,l roomy, reliable
Last Studebaker President-burdensome to drive and poorly built
The authors conculsion was that the magazine proves the old saying about antique cars: What's popular new will be popular when it turns old.
I've never been a big fan of Consumer Reports but it was interesting to know their opinion of Studebakers at the time.
Ken
Comment