This is from Consumer Bulletin magazine, July 1962. Thought some might find the comparisons to the Lark wagon interesting:
Hopefully you can expand it enough to read
Hopefully you can expand it enough to read
-
Last edited by Bob Andrews; 01-29-2011, 02:51 PM.Proud NON-CASO
I do not prize the word "cheap." It is not a badge of honor...it is a symbol of despair. ~ William McKinley
If it is decreed that I should go down, then let me go down linked with the truth - let me die in the advocacy of what is just and right.- Lincoln
GOD BLESS AMERICA
Ephesians 6:10-17
Romans 15:13
Deuteronomy 31:6
Proverbs 28:1
Illegitimi non carborundum -
'62 Lark Wagons Cargo Space
Interesting, the Lark comes up about 3.5 Inches short of most other Compacts in total seat down Cargo Length, but matches the best: Falcon/Comet on Max. Cargo Width, and is a little narrow between the wheelwells on Min. Cargo Width.
bottom Line: Total Average Cubic Ft. of Cargo space, Lark is 74.0 C.F. better than Valiant/Lancer, Corvair, Tempest, Special, F-85 and way better than Rambler American.
I think it was a little unfair to toss the AMC Rambler Classic and Ambassidor in with the true Compacts, because of the large Size, and Price differences.
StudeRich
Second Generation Stude Driver,
Proud '54 Starliner Owner
SDC Member Since 1967
Comment