A Flight of Hawks

[HUB]

I think I've got this picture business figured out now so here's a pic of our white 1963 GT Hawk keeping good company at the car show in Shedden, Ontario on Sunday 11 June, 2006. Sunny day, nice breeze, met some great Studebaker folk and won the 50-50 draw - doesn't get much better!

[56H-Y6]

Hi
A group of hawks is called a cast of hawks.
Regards
Steve

[52hawk]

Quite a nice 'Cast' of Hawks, Hub!

LaSalle,Il
61Hawk
60Lark

[Roscomacaw]

A handsome trio by any standards! Of course, the Larks are cool too.

Miscreant at large.

1957 Transtar 1/2ton
1960 Larkvertible V8
1958 Provincial wagon
1953 Commander coupe
1957 President 2-dr
1955 President State
1951 Champion Biz cpe
1963 Daytona project FS

[HUB]

Hey Steve - thanks. I've learned something today! A cast of Hawks. I guess Studebaker figured Flight Hawk would fly but Cast Hawk wouldn't.
Cheers, HUB
PS - Here's the entire cast from the other angle. [8D]

[JBOYLE]

STUPID Question Alert!!!

I don't know a lot about GTs...
Do they all have the same tailights...
the middle car looks different from the white one...or is it just the photo/my eyes?
63 Avanti R1 2788
1914 Stutz Bearcat
(George Barris replica)

Washington State

[mbstude]

63's had painted bezels, 62's had chrome,(middle car) I think... Not sure about 64's.

Matthew Burnette, the 16 year old Stude nut.
South Georgia Chapter
63 Daytona HT (project)
51 Stude dump truck (yes, I won the raffle)
52 Commander Starliner (basket case)

MANY more Studes in the family and a few parts cars

http://community.webshots.com/user/mbstude101

And here: http://community.webshots.com/user/mbstudepagetwo
And here too: http://photos.yahoo.com/ph//my_photos

[JDP]

62 and 63 were painted over chrome and chrome, 64's are all chrome.

Studebaker On The Net http://stude.com
Studebaker News Group

http://groups.google.com/group/alt.autos.studebaker

64 Daytona HT
64 R2 4 speed Challenger
63 R2 4 speed GT Black
63 R2 4 speed GT White
63 GT Hawk
63 Avanti
62 Daytona HT
53 Coupe

[StudeRich]

J Boyle; If you are comparing details of GT's the white one is missing the black stripe on the bottom of the decklid overlay, or it has a '62 panel, they also are different -'62's have depressed Stude. Hawk lettering and '63's have larger raised lettering. Also the right & left air scoops (Side Grilles) are chromed on '62 Canadian only GT's, simular looking to '56-'61 Hawks !!

Rich.


[quote]Originally posted by JBOYLE

STUPID [blue]Question Alert!!!

[font=Comic Sans MS]I don't know a lot about GTs...
Do they all have the same tailights...
the middle car looks different from the white one...or is it just the photo/my eyes

StudeRich
Ferndale, WA

[HUB]

Some of you have an eagle eye for Hawks! Yes, our white '63 sports a '62 rear panel. The black '62 had correct trim I believe with the exception of the outside rearview mirrors while the red '63 had chrome bezel tail lights from a '62.
AS for myself, I have to say I liked the look of the '62 Hawks with their extra chrome fore and aft.
If anyone has a line on a good rear panel for a 1962 with the black strip on the bottom edge, which would be correct for our car, I'm interested.

[studegary]

quote:Originally posted by HUB

Some of you have an eagle eye for Hawks! Yes, our white '63 sports a '62 rear panel. The black '62 had correct trim I believe with the exception of the outside rearview mirrors while the red '63 had chrome bezel tail lights from a '62.
AS for myself, I have to say I liked the look of the '62 Hawks with their extra chrome fore and aft.
If anyone has a line on a good rear panel for a 1962 with the black strip on the bottom edge, which would be correct for our car, I'm interested.

You may have mistyped. I would image that you are looking for a rear panel for a 1963, not a "1962."

Gary L.
1954 Commander Starliner (restomod)
1959 DeLuxe pickup (restomod)

[HUB]

Thanks for catching the typo Gary - yes I meant to say I'm looking for the correct'63 panel with black strip at the bottom[:I]. Getting late when I can't keep my 2's and 3's straight! Better hit the sack!