PDA

View Full Version : nice little lark cheap



289stude
12-23-2009, 07:54 AM
http://sacramento.craigslist.org/cto/1521994211.html


John

63' R1 Wagonaire

63' 8E45 Detroit

53' 2R5 R1 Powershift TT Under Construction

57' Transtar 304 NP540 4:09 TT Under Construction (in Picture)

58' 3E6D Stock

59' 4E2 122 Scotsman Deluxe V8 4spd curb side fender

61' 6E7 122 Factory Auto

http://i126.photobucket.com/albums/p99/289stude/transtar3-1-2.jpg

BobGlasscock
12-23-2009, 08:02 AM
So much nice chrome. I'd go for a trade if I had something he wanted. And I'm not even in love with Larks. But I know people who are.

'50 Champion, 1 family owner
http://i251.photobucket.com/albums/gg316/studebakerbob/SDC%20avatar/Studebakerstuff019.jpghttp://i251.photobucket.com/albums/gg316/studebakerbob/SDC%20avatar/Studebakerstuff018.jpg

Swifster
12-23-2009, 09:56 AM
That white one would be a better deal.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tom - Mulberry, FL

1964 Studebaker Daytona - 289 4V, 4-Speed (Cost To Date: $2161.27)

1964 Studebaker Commander 170-1V, 3-speed w/OD (Cost to Date: $623.67)

http://i74.photobucket.com/albums/i280/Swifster/The%20Daytona%20File/Avatar%20Size/01-01-05TheStartingPoint.jpg http://i74.photobucket.com/albums/i280/Swifster/The%20Daytona%20File/Avatar%20Size/07-17-07FrontClipRemoved.jpg

silverhawk
12-23-2009, 07:32 PM
I like them both, but if I was buying I'd go for the '62, but that is because I LOVE '62 larks, exspecially 4 doors and convertables. Yes, I'm biased,LOL!

Dylan Wills
http://i483.photobucket.com/albums/rr200/1961lark/My%201961%20studebaker%20lark/Watcomcountyminimeet09andJamesBe-2.jpg
'61 lark deluxe 4 door wagon

StudeRich
12-23-2009, 07:46 PM
Wow! Someone needs to rescue that poor little White '62 Lark 4 dr. from all those UNSTYLISH GM things, THEY MIGHT BE CONTAGEOUS! [V] [}:)] [xx(]

StudeRich

Steve T
12-23-2009, 07:55 PM
tum te tum te tum...ignoring the inexpensive Larks...good thing they're all too far away...one is enough, one is enough, one is enough...

:D

S.