Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Why have so many superchargers been removed....

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Why have so many superchargers been removed....

    ...from Hawks, Packards, etc.? Undependable? Lack of service knowledge? Lack of normal maintenance?

    John

  • #2
    Fuel economy, perhaps.
    These cars were all around during the oil embargo of the 70s...

    I think your summary probably covers the gamut. On any given car owned, I've gone without a non-essential feature from time to time...but I'd be hard pressed to put a supercharger in that category![8D]

    Andy
    62 GT

    Andy
    62 GT

    Comment


    • #3
      Early ones were oiled by a line kinda like a pressure guage......If the oil was not changed REAL regular.......bearings in S/C would go bad.

      1961 Hawk 4BC,4-SPEED,TT

      Ken Byrd
      Lewisville,NC
      1961 Hawk ...4-Speed;4bc;Twin Traction

      Ken Byrd
      Lewisville,NC

      Comment


      • #4
        I would agree. I have heard of several being removed because of bearing problems and since the engine will run without a supercharger, people didn't spend the money for a rebuild.


        1952 Champion Starlight, 1962 Daytona, both w/overdrive.Searcy,Arkansas
        "I may be lazy, but I'm not shiftless."
        "In the heart of Arkansas."
        Searcy, Arkansas
        1952 Commander 2 door. Really fine 259.
        1952 2R pickup

        Comment


        • #5
          All of the above!

          If you would read Andy Granatelli's autobiography "They Call Me Mister 500", he addresses some of that...poor quality control of the planetary balls that allowed slightly different sized bearings to be installed and that created a situation where some planetary balls carried an unequal load which led to early failure.

          I'm sure lack of service knowledge and proper maintenance had much to do with it as well. The expense of rebuilding the blowers also has something to do with it.



          Poet...Mystic...Soldier of Fortune. As always...self-absorbed, adversarial, cocky and in general a malcontent.
          Poet...Mystic...Soldier of Fortune. As always...self-absorbed, adversarial, cocky and in general a malcontent.

          Comment


          • #6
            I think you can relate it to those crazy AIR PUMPS that 1970's GM cars had for the smog system. When they went out, people just disconnected the belt, am sure they ran poorly, or had to have other parts tweaked to run, but why replace something if it will run without it?

            The Superchargers Studebaker used, had no engine oil feed, they only had a tiny crankcase, so due to their extreamly high operating speed, the oil needed changing every 2000 miles without fail.

            Also, they require High Quality ATF, NOT engine oil. In those days all they had was Type A, now-days we can use higher quality Type "F" or Synthetics.

            The reason it never happened, is that there is no drain! It requires using a suction pump or removal and dumping it out the fill pipe.

            This would be your number one reason for failure and removal.


            StudeRich at Studebakers Northwest -Ferndale,WA
            StudeRich
            Second Generation Stude Driver,
            Proud '54 Starliner Owner
            SDC Member Since 1967

            Comment


            • #7
              All that Rich said plus the fact it holds only 10 ounces of oil. Not much for a safeguard reserve, especially at the high RPM's it winds.

              60 Lark convertible
              61 Champ
              62 Daytona convertible
              63 G.T. R-2,4 speed
              63 Avanti (2)
              66 Daytona Sport Sedan
              59 Lark wagon, now V-8, H.D. auto!
              60 Lark convertible V-8 auto
              61 Champ 1/2 ton 4 speed
              62 Champ 3/4 ton 5 speed o/drive
              62 Champ 3/4 ton auto
              62 Daytona convertible V-8 4 speed & 62 Cruiser, auto.
              63 G.T. Hawk R-2,4 speed
              63 Avanti (2) R-1 auto
              64 Zip Van
              66 Daytona Sport Sedan(327)V-8 4 speed
              66 Cruiser V-8 auto

              Comment


              • #8
                quote: Undependable? Lack of service knowledge? Lack of normal maintenance?
                All of the above.
                quote:
                Fuel economy, perhaps. These cars were all around during the oil embargo of the 70s...
                The superchargers from '57-58 models were gone long before that. When I was buying them in the early '60s, if the supercharger was still with the car, it was disconnected or in the trunk. I never saw a working supercharger on daily driven car.

                thnx, jack vines



                PackardV8
                PackardV8

                Comment


                • #9
                  When we picked up the Lark the supercharger was off. The FI unit had a larger diameter inlet that prevented the bonnet from seating, so it was replaced with an ordinary Edelbrock air cleaner. The JTS engine functioned great from the time it had the Edelbrock, to the K&N, to the draft through when the Paxton was installed but disconnected, clear up to the time the Paxton was "switched on". You could say a modification required a little altering of the engine, and the removal of the blower. I'd agree that lack of service knowledge and maintenance will send these to the trunk of the car. When this mysterious contraption(still had the Paxton lead seal on it) let it's bearing race loose a couple of years ago, we didn't want to get inside to replace these parts. From what I was told a few of the parts are sensitive to even the oil on our fingers, as well as needed some tight tolerances. If something went wrong this blower would be coming off twice, and we really don't like doing things twice in a row. We had to send ours to Thibeault who specialized in repairing these things, of which is now operating again on a daily driven car without fault. If the vehicle was in daily service, I presume many people would set aside the blower for a future rebuild, all the while running the car without it. I would also presume if the blower went bad, it was easier to find a running blower and stick it on, of which I did when my original blower was in the shop.

                  Now when I ran around with the import guys, one of the biggest splits was who was a turbo or a supercharger fan. I could go either way, but there is a, shall I say, slight disadvantage with the turbo(on a stock vehicle). A turbo's lubrication is engine fed, which means in most instances the oil that it needs, needs to be pumped up into the housing. On a morning when that engine is first started, for a brief second, that turbo is running dry until the oil flows into the housing. Our Paxtons have this neat feature where the oil reservoir is right under the critical parts. On startup the Paxton is getting its lubrication almost instantly. Does this mean that a turbo is unreliable? No, it just means that an individual shouldn't be mashing the gas and gunning a cold engine to start the car every morning, lest ye incur turbo damage.

                  [img=left]http://i158.photobucket.com/albums/t102/PlainBrownR2/My%201950%202r5%20Studebaker%20Pickup%20with%20turbocharger/P1000137-1.jpg[/img=left][img=left]http://i158.photobucket.com/albums/t102/PlainBrownR2/My%201950%202r5%20Studebaker%20Pickup%20with%20turbocharger/P1000145-1.jpg[/img=left][IMG=right]http://i158.photobucket.com/albums/t102/PlainBrownR2/Ex%20Studebaker%20Plant%20Locomotive/P1000578-1.jpg[/IMG=right]
                  [IMG=right]http://i158.photobucket.com/albums/t102/PlainBrownR2/My%201964%20Studebaker%20Commander%20R2/P1010168.jpg[/IMG=right]

                  1964 Studebaker Commander R2 clone
                  1963 Studebaker Daytona Hardtop with no engine or transmission
                  1950 Studebaker 2R5 w/170 six cylinder and 3spd OD
                  1955 Studebaker Commander Hardtop w/289 and 3spd OD and Megasquirt port fuel injection(among other things)

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    quote:Originally posted by blackhawk61

                    Early ones were oiled by a line kinda like a pressure guage......If the oil was not changed REAL regular.......bearings in S/C would go bad.

                    1961 Hawk 4BC,4-SPEED,TT

                    Ken Byrd
                    Lewisville,NC
                    Not early Studebakers, they all used the self contained oil system.

                    JDP/Maryland
                    JDP Maryland

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      quote:Originally posted by JDP

                      quote:Originally posted by blackhawk61

                      Early ones were oiled by a line kinda like a pressure guage......If the oil was not changed REAL regular.......bearings in S/C would go bad.

                      1961 Hawk 4BC,4-SPEED,TT

                      Ken Byrd
                      Lewisville,NC
                      Not early Studebakers, they all used the self contained oil system.

                      JDP/Maryland
                      Well.......I was working from memory from 40 years ago ......I though my 57 GH was that way .......guess not.

                      1961 Hawk 4BC,4-SPEED,TT

                      Ken Byrd
                      Lewisville,NC
                      1961 Hawk ...4-Speed;4bc;Twin Traction

                      Ken Byrd
                      Lewisville,NC

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        quote:Originally posted by blackhawk61

                        Early ones were oiled by a line kinda like a pressure guage......If the oil was not changed REAL regular.......bearings in S/C would go bad.

                        Ken Byrd
                        Ken: You're thinking of the Ford-application 1957 McCulloch supercharger. It was a whole different design and you are correct; engine oil did circulate through it for cooling and lubrication...but not so the Studebaker version.

                        (You Carolina boys' been sneakin' around working on 1957 312/300 HP Ford Custom 2-doors to run NASCAR against the '57 Chevy Black Widows, eh?[:0]) BP
                        We've got to quit saying, "How stupid can you be?" Too many people are taking it as a challenge.

                        G. K. Chesterton: This triangle of truisms, of father, mother, and child, cannot be destroyed; it can only destroy those civilizations which disregard it.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          quote:Originally posted by BobPalma

                          quote:Originally posted by blackhawk61

                          Early ones were oiled by a line kinda like a pressure guage......If the oil was not changed REAL regular.......bearings in S/C would go bad.

                          Ken Byrd
                          Ken: You're thinking of the Ford-application 1957 McCulloch supercharger. It was a whole different design and you are correct; engine oil did circulate through it for cooling and lubrication...but not so the Studebaker version.

                          (You Carolina boys' been sneakin' around working on 1957 312/300 HP Ford Custom 2-doors to run NASCAR against the '57 Chevy Black Widows, eh?[:0]) BP
                          Bob,
                          Could have been that is what was on my 57 GH.....I was in Denver,Colo. at the time and a friend that worked at Kenz-Leslie there(Ford Hi-Po folks)set me up with the 300hp Supercharged Ford 4b Carb and bonnet to put on mine.....Could be I had the supercharger too....Along with a few more mods. (This was in my Hot Rod days)......Sure did run good !

                          1961 Hawk 4BC,4-SPEED,TT

                          Ken Byrd
                          Lewisville,NC
                          1961 Hawk ...4-Speed;4bc;Twin Traction

                          Ken Byrd
                          Lewisville,NC

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            quote:Originally posted by blackhawk61

                            quote:Originally posted by BobPalma
                            Ken: You're thinking of the Ford-application 1957 McCulloch supercharger. It was a whole different design and you are correct; engine oil did circulate through it for cooling and lubrication...but not so the Studebaker version.

                            (You Carolina boys' been sneakin' around working on 1957 312/300 HP Ford Custom 2-doors to run NASCAR against the '57 Chevy Black Widows, eh?[:0]) BP
                            Bob,
                            Could have been that is what was on my 57 GH.....I was in Denver,Colo. at the time and a friend that worked at Kenz-Leslie there(Ford Hi-Po folks)set me up with the 300hp Supercharged Ford 4b Carb and bonnet to put on mine.....Could be I had the supercharger too....Along with a few more mods. (This was in my Hot Rod days)......Sure did run good !

                            Ken Byrd
                            How 'bout that! That's entirely possible, Ken.

                            If they went to all the trouble to fit a 1957 312/300 Ford combo with Ford's 4bbl on your '57 GH, they would have logically used the Ford-style McCulloch and it would have needed a tap to the engine's oiling system for lubrication. That would have been readily available off one of the small pipe plugs normally used for a partial-flow oil filter up front on non-supercharged Studebaker V-8s of the era. They probably started with a Studebaker 4bbl manifold, too, and tossed the GH's 2bbl and box.

                            Quite a coincidence! BP
                            We've got to quit saying, "How stupid can you be?" Too many people are taking it as a challenge.

                            G. K. Chesterton: This triangle of truisms, of father, mother, and child, cannot be destroyed; it can only destroy those civilizations which disregard it.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              While we're talking about superchargers, I have a couple of questions. By the way, when I say "oil" i really mean ATF.

                              Can you overfill the supercharger oil? If you can, and you do, what will happen?

                              Would it be possible to build some type of auxiliary oil chamber that feeds oil into the supercharger?

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X