Need to replace the fuel tank used in the #5 1964 R-3 GT Hawk that was run at Bonneville. Does anyone recall what was used?
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
What was the 30 gal fuel tank used in the #5 64 GT Hawk?
Collapse
X
-
Does it resemble a Bolted in Tank like all stock Studes. or a Strapped in one?
The Granatelli's must have planned on a whole LOT of flying Mile and longer, high speed runs!Last edited by StudeRich; 05-09-2019, 11:08 PM.StudeRich
Second Generation Stude Driver,
Proud '54 Starliner Owner
SDC Member Since 1967
-
They were a standard tank that had some height added. Stude International actually had a couple of NOS ones on display in South Bend two years ago. Otherwise, maybe Nelson Bove could lend some advice.
Didn’t know that the Bonneville Hawk was still around. What’s the story?
Comment
-
Originally posted by mbstude View PostDidn’t know that the Bonneville Hawk was still around. What’s the story?
But the engine survives: http://forum.studebakerdriversclub.c...-Engine-Found-!!!!!!
Craig
Comment
-
Originally posted by t walgamuth View PostActually at Bonneville they sometimes add weight to increase traction. He might have done it for the extra weight in fuel. The studes are notoriously light in back.
IIRC, the Burke Avanti had the spare tire well in the trunk poured full of concrete for the same reason; weight adds traction.
jack vinesPackardV8
Comment
-
Originally posted by mbstude View PostThey were a standard tank that had some height added. Stude International actually had a couple of NOS ones on display in South Bend two years ago. Otherwise, maybe Nelson Bove could lend some advice.
Didn’t know that the Bonneville Hawk was still around. What’s the story?StudeRick & Johna
Sacramento CA
1964 GT Hawk, 1963 GT Hawk, 1962 GT Hawk
1957 Silver Hawk
1963 Avanti
1961 Lark Wagon
1963 Lark Daytona
Comment
-
Originally posted by t walgamuth View PostActually at Bonneville they sometimes add weight to increase traction. He might have done it for the extra weight in fuel. The studes are notoriously light in back.Last edited by whitehawk759; 05-15-2019, 12:00 PM.Don Watson
61 Hawk
Comment
-
Of course! For the weight on salt where traction is often not the best. A USAF friend bought a 63 Corvair and had me overhaul it. That was actually fun. The car needed several concrete blocks in the "trunk" -up front- to keep it steerable over 60. The front end was so light it would float at higher speeds
Comment
Comment