So lets say Studebaker vehicles continued to be built for 1967, and the truck line got a new lease on life...what model name/number do you suppose a 67 1/2 ton V-8 engine truck with 8 ft. box would have been assigned? Would it have been a 9E7, 10E7, or 11E7, or something completely different? Studebaker nomenclature for trucks never really made sense to me because there always seemed to be an 'exception-and-if-or-but-depending on' to the rules. What's your best guess?..just wondering. cheers Junior
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
What model designation would a 1967 Studebaker truck be assigned?
Collapse
X
-
A 1967 could be a 11E7-122 but it would not be a "T" or a "C" Cab, they would both be NEW Designs; the "U" Cab and the "D" Cab!StudeRich
Second Generation Stude Driver,
Proud '54 Starliner Owner
SDC Member Since 1967
Comment
-
Why would they have to use numbers???? Like some of today's vehicles, they could give them clever names. Today, we have trucks with names, Avalanche, Luv, Ranger, Silverado, Tundra, Titan, Ridgeline, etc.
Studebaker could have added another "Trend" to their record. Perhaps truck names like, CONJECTURE, SPECULATION, OR WHATIF!...would have been appropriate given Studebaker's market position.John Clary
Greer, SC
SDC member since 1975
Comment
-
Originally posted by jclary View PostWhy would they have to use numbers???? Like some of today's vehicles, they could give them clever names. Today, we have trucks with names, Avalanche, Luv, Ranger, Silverado, Tundra, Titan, Ridgeline, etc.
Studebaker could have added another "Trend" to their record. Perhaps truck names like, CONJECTURE, SPECULATION, OR WHATIF!...would have been appropriate given Studebaker's market position.sigpic
1954 C5 Hamilton car.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by jclary View PostWhy would they have to use numbers???? Like some of today's vehicles, they could give them clever names. Today, we have trucks with names, Avalanche, Luv, Ranger, Silverado, Tundra, Titan, Ridgeline, etc.
Studebaker could have added another "Trend" to their record. Perhaps truck names like, CONJECTURE, SPECULATION, OR WHATIF!...would have been appropriate given Studebaker's market position.Gary L.
Wappinger, NY
SDC member since 1968
Studebaker enthusiast much longer
Comment
-
So if Studebaker did market a 1967 truck light-duty pick-up truck line do you think they would have continued with the CHAMP or TRANSTAR names or come up with something totally new. Didn't the proposed car lines have new names for 1967? cheers, juniorsigpic
1954 C5 Hamilton car.
Comment
-
1967 would probably have been a Studebaker-badged Isuzu pickup, provided the proposed line of rebadged Isuzu cars sold well to justify a light commercial line. http://forum.studebakerdriversclub.c...ghlight=merger
Craig
Comment
-
BTW since the truck rights were sold to Altman along with the Avanti....do these "rights" technically still exist in some legal limbo? Maybe a new Studebaker car is a tough sell....but a truck? Trucks are "hot" now.....(yes I remember the stillborn XUV or whatever it was)
Comment
-
Originally posted by junior View PostSo 11E7-122...would the 122 be for the wheelbase? cheers, Junior
1967 = 11, E7 = 1/2 Ton V8.
Of course they had names; Champ, Transtar, Studebaker Deluxe, Coupe Express, but that would be determined by the Sales Dept.
Since Dodge and International "borrowed" Studebaker's names, why not call it the Durango?StudeRich
Second Generation Stude Driver,
Proud '54 Starliner Owner
SDC Member Since 1967
Comment
-
How about calling the new for 67 one half ton trucks S-100's, three quarter ton trucks, S-200's, one ton trucks would be, S-300's.
Chevrolet had C-10's, Ford has F-150's Dodge has D100's etc.sigpic1957 Packard Clipper Country Sedan
"There's nothing stronger than the heart of a volunteer"
Lt. Col. Jimmy Doolittle
"I have a great memory for forgetting things" Number 1 son, Lee Chan
Comment
-
Originally posted by jclary View PostWhy would they have to use numbers???? Like some of today's vehicles, they could give them clever names. Today, we have trucks with names, Avalanche, Luv, Ranger, Silverado, Tundra, Titan, Ridgeline, etc.Skip Lackie
Comment
-
Originally posted by Skip Lackie View PostAgree with Studegary. I suspect if you peel the onion back a layer or two, every vehicle manufacturer assigned alpha-numeric designations to their products that did not depend on the common names, which often changed and/or were reassigned to other models. I've owned a 62 Chevy Impala convertible for >50 years, and I long ago learned that if I wanted to find something for it in the GM parts books, I had to remember that it was really a model 62-1867.John Clary
Greer, SC
SDC member since 1975
Comment
Comment