This from a story about the Argentinian sub that sank a year ago and has been found:
"The missing vessel was a German-built diesel-electric TR-1700 class submarine commission in the 1980s. It was refitted between 2008 and 2014, costing around $12."
The Associated Press contributed to the report. I see examples like this almost every day. I used to be a proofreader and NOTHING like this ought to get by any decent editor before it's made public.
No wonder the press has a bad reputation for accuracy and so on.
On the other hand, if this is accurate maybe it explains why it sank. Twelve dollars for a refit doesn't sound like very high quality.
And then there's the "commission" instead of "commissioned".
Think of all the people still looking for a job and some bozos get paid for THIS?
"The missing vessel was a German-built diesel-electric TR-1700 class submarine commission in the 1980s. It was refitted between 2008 and 2014, costing around $12."
The Associated Press contributed to the report. I see examples like this almost every day. I used to be a proofreader and NOTHING like this ought to get by any decent editor before it's made public.
No wonder the press has a bad reputation for accuracy and so on.
On the other hand, if this is accurate maybe it explains why it sank. Twelve dollars for a refit doesn't sound like very high quality.
And then there's the "commission" instead of "commissioned".
Think of all the people still looking for a job and some bozos get paid for THIS?
Comment