Originally posted by stude dude
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
1956 Pelham Wagon
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by sals54 View PostThats a really good looking wagon. Especially for the price. I decent looking, nice running, starting and stopping car for $4500 ? ? ? Thats a steal.
I also have a pair of NOS Provincial emblems that could go with the car if someone on the forum buys it.
JamesBells Studebaker Diner & Museum
Bellingham, WA.
Comment
-
Comment
-
-
Can anyone explain why Studebaker created what Rich describes as the "Package Shelf" at the back of the body?
It seems if they made the body a half a foot (or so) longer to eliminate it they would add a few extra cubic feet of cargo space, a good selling point.Dan Peterson
Montpelier, VT
1960 Lark V-8 Convertible
1960 Lark V-8 Convertible (parts car)
Comment
-
Originally posted by dpson View PostCan anyone explain why Studebaker created what Rich describes as the "Package Shelf" at the back of the body?
It seems if they made the body a half a foot (or so) longer to eliminate it they would add a few extra cubic feet of cargo space, a good selling point.
When comparing the line up of '56 to '57/8 you'll see that the '56 wagon bodies were shorter and still looked very much like they were left over from '54 or '55. In '57 Studebaker spent just enough money on tooling to lengthen the quarter panel, but not enough to do the same with that same old shell from '54. Plus- they had already spent a bunch of money to make said shell into the four door wagons that the public wanted, and the market demanded they have.
But honestly- I think if they had done what you say- the four door wagons would'a looked funny because I'll bet you Studebaker would not have put them on the longer wheelbase chassis they would have needed to 'look right'.
StudeDave '57
Comment
-
Originally posted by Steve McEwan View PostI am now a fan of the 56 since buying this one.
1956 Pelam
A Commander V8 Parkview looks the same until you check the Serial Number Plate, Body Tag or Engine?StudeRich
Second Generation Stude Driver,
Proud '54 Starliner Owner
SDC Member Since 1967
Comment
-
The Body Tag on the Right side Firewall would say 56G-D4 for a Champion Pelham and a G prefix Serial Number on the Door post Serial Number Plate.
If it has all 3 Nameplates it probably was a Pelham Champion Six, I figured there was no Engine so you could not tell by that.
If there is a Hole in the Left Front Fender rear corner though the Cowl for the Antenna, it is probably missing the Optional Radio.StudeRich
Second Generation Stude Driver,
Proud '54 Starliner Owner
SDC Member Since 1967
Comment
-
Originally posted by Steve McEwan View PostI am now a fan of the 56 since buying this one.
[ATTACH=CONFIG]58767[/ATTACH]
1956 Pelam
I have always loved the styling of the '53 through '57 Studebakers. I also like the '62-'63s as well. '56 has to be my favorite of all years though. Great styling, headroom, legroom, and cargo capacity. My hope is to get Bess ('56 Parkview) back on the road this year. However, so far, that wish hasn't been granted. Work'in towards it though.Home of the famous Mr. Ed!
K.I.S.S. Keep It Simple Studebaker!
Ron Smith
Where the heck is Fawn Lodge, CA?
Comment
-
sals54:
As sleek, long, low and just plain SEXY as your wagon is going to look.
Could you PLEASE extent those rocker panels back that 1" to 1 1/4" to line up with the rear wheel well.
That unsightly jog makes my eyes ache every time I allow myself to look at it on any Studebaker.South Lompoc Studebaker
Comment
Comment