Results 1 to 14 of 14

Thread: New Chassis?

  1. #1
    President Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    Kenmore, WA
    Posts
    1,566

    New Chassis?

    Couple of questions:

    I'm curious. Many chassis' that I've seen in 50's-era Hawks have looked pretty fragile. Is anyone manufacturing new replacement chassis' that outwardly look the same but are stronger for Studebakers? Would there even be a market for them?

    What's with powder coating? I can't remember anyone doing it when I was in the automotive trade 40 years ago, now it seems to be all the rage. Is it considered "appropriate" when restoring a classic car from scratch?

    Mike O'Handley
    Kenmore, Washington
    hausdok@msn.com

  2. #2
    President Member
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Gananoque, Ontario, Canada.
    Posts
    558
    Art Morrison does them.
    Bill Foy
    Gananoque, Ontario
    1964 Wagonaire - 1953 Starlight Coupe

  3. #3
    President Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    Kenmore, WA
    Posts
    1,566
    Hi,

    Yes, I recall seeing an article somewhere that featured Art Morrison's shop but none of the chassis' that I saw being produced in any of those photos looked like they were recreating the stock chassis. I know that one can get frame builders to build replacement chassis using an old chassis as a template, and they are usually superior to the ones built by manufacturers because the custom chassis builder isn't trying to save every penny he can on the build the way that manufacturers do. However, what I was wondering about was companies building a chassis that when placed next to the stock chassis looks the same but is in fact heavier and stronger. It looks like the interior of the Studebaker enclosed frame rails would be the ideal place to add hidden reinforcement while still keeping the look of the original.

    Any opinion on the powder coating phenomenon?

    Mike O'Handley
    Kenmore, Washington
    hausdok@msn.com

  4. #4
    Golden Hawk Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Ferndale, WA, USA.
    Posts
    17,031
    Hi Mike, as far as the powder coating goes, most people have had good luck with the POR15 coating on the outside and some have even used a sprinkler like wand to do the inside, this is in my opinion and many others, it's a more durable method than anything out there.

    My experience with powder coating may vary from yours, but when I had my Chrysler wheels done for a Stude. the powder did not penetrate into the tiny crevices like between the wheel center and the rim, causing rust later and it was not as durable as advertised either.

    Also keep in mind if you did not know, that 1962 and on Studebaker frames are quite a bit better than '54 to '61, except Lark 2 Dr. Sedans they are all 11 gauge.
    Last edited by StudeRich; 08-25-2011 at 08:01 PM.
    StudeRich
    Second Generation Stude Driver
    Proud '54 Starliner Owner



  5. #5
    President Member ozarkman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Fayetteville, AR, USA.
    Posts
    704
    I've been told by many that a GT Hawk chassis is almost a bolt on upgrade for the older C/K bodies. Can anyone confirm this.

  6. #6
    Silver Hawk Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Spokane, WA, USA.
    Posts
    5,237
    Many chassis' that I've seen in 50's-era Hawks have looked pretty fragile.
    With a bit of reinforcement to the front crossmember, they are sufficient unto the purpose. What are you planning to do with a '50s era Hawk which would require a stronger frame?

    jack vines
    PackardV8

  7. #7
    President Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    Kenmore, WA
    Posts
    1,566
    Quote Originally Posted by PackardV8 View Post
    With a bit of reinforcement to the front crossmember, they are sufficient unto the purpose. What are you planning to do with a '50s era Hawk which would require a stronger frame?

    jack vines
    Hi Jack,

    Nothing really, they just look fragile compared to some other chassis' I've seen and I was wondering if anyone had ever produced a stronger look alike.

    Mike O'Handley
    Kenmore, Washington
    hausdok@msn.com

  8. #8
    Silver Hawk Member Bob Andrews's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Parish, central NY
    Posts
    6,622
    I agree, Mike, they are more fragile than other brands. But as Jack says, thet will serve just fine for all but the most extreme uses. A few gussets at key spots on the front crossmember and you're set.
    Proud NON-CASO I do not prize the word "cheap." It is not a badge of honor...it is a symbol of despair. ~ William McKinley If it is decreed that I should go down, then let me go down linked with the truth—let me die in the advocacy of what is just and right.- Lincoln GOD BLESS AMERICAEphesians 6:10-17Romans 15:13Deuteronomy 31:6Proverbs 28:1 Illegitimi non carborundum

  9. #9
    Speedster Member ralt12's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    SoCal, USA
    Posts
    426
    The Morrison chassis looks like this:
    '53 Commander
    Art Morrison chassis
    LS6 ASA/4L60E

    http://www.nelsonmotorsports.com/Nel...tudebaker.html

  10. #10
    President Member woodysrods's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Westbank, B.C., Canada.
    Posts
    2,687
    Quote Originally Posted by ralt12 View Post
    The Morrison chassis looks like this:
    How is your project coming?
    Any updated pictures??
    Brian
    Brian Woods
    woodysrods@shaw.ca
    1946 M Series (Shop Truck)

  11. #11
    President Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    Kenmore, WA
    Posts
    1,566
    Quote Originally Posted by ralt12 View Post
    The Morrison chassis looks like this:
    Nice,

    I guess if I wanted to create a daily driver restoration, I'd be looking at something like that from a safety point of view. How's the ride with that coil rear suspension compared to the original?

    Mike O'Handley
    Kenmore, Washington
    hausdok@msn.com

  12. #12
    Silver Hawk Member Bob Andrews's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Parish, central NY
    Posts
    6,622
    Quote Originally Posted by hausdok View Post
    Nice,

    I guess if I wanted to create a daily driver restoration, I'd be looking at something like that from a safety point of view. How's the ride with that coil rear suspension compared to the original?

    Mike O'Handley
    Kenmore, Washington
    hausdok@msn.com
    There's nothing unsafe about the stock Studebaker frame design! That would be no reason to go aftermarket.
    Proud NON-CASO I do not prize the word "cheap." It is not a badge of honor...it is a symbol of despair. ~ William McKinley If it is decreed that I should go down, then let me go down linked with the truth—let me die in the advocacy of what is just and right.- Lincoln GOD BLESS AMERICAEphesians 6:10-17Romans 15:13Deuteronomy 31:6Proverbs 28:1 Illegitimi non carborundum

  13. #13
    Speedster Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    san antonio, tx, USA.
    Posts
    372
    RE: using a 62 (and up) frame for an older C/K or hawk. I had to move two body mount pads from the inside to the outside of the rails and eliminate another pair. Only left me with 21 body mounts (lol). Also, the rear spring perches are different, so you need the offset rear springs from the 62.
    Piece of cake, especially if you set them side by side.
    Hardest part was aligning the body on the later frame. It seems each body is shimmed to fit a specific frame, so the shims you have now are irrelevant. Not rocket science, but for an old man without a lift, kind of a PITA.
    Fairly easy to find. Sal offered me one for $100, but he was too far away. Found one close for the same price.
    Well worth the money and effort.

    Don't know when they switched from 2 piece to 1 piece drive shaft, but you would need to move the carrier over if you want to keep a 2 piece.
    Last edited by oldguy; 08-26-2011 at 10:33 AM. Reason: added note
    Of course it will fit, I have a torch.
    53 coupe, to be brought back from the dead.

  14. #14
    President Member Flashback's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Wetumpka, Alabama, USA.
    Posts
    3,072
    The 53 I am driving now is one of best drivers I have ever had. This includes all brands.
    I have done body offs, to fixer uppers. I can have months of fun and buy a lots of gas
    with what it would cost to make the frame purty. If it's not rusty or damaged, it's only
    another "trick". More tricks- more trouble. Remember "weight is our enemy".

    I HAVE ALWAYS BEEN A DREAMER

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •