When did Studebaker move the shifter to the column?
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Three-on-the-tree......
Collapse
X
-
I had a '40 Champion with column shift and my parents '39 Commander had column shift so I am gonna guess it was '39.Don Wilson, Centralia, WA
40 Champion 4 door*
50 Champion 2 door*
53 Commander K Auto*
53 Commander K overdrive*
55 President Speedster
62 GT 4Speed*
63 Avanti R1*
64 Champ 1/2 ton
* Formerly owned
Comment
-
My question is why? Maybe to fit more people in the front seat? I think the floor shift is more comfortable, i have 56 power hawk thats 3 on the tree
I"d like to convert it but dont want to cut a hole in the floor, it"s a pretty nice 1 owner car with 54k on it. Even have the
Original indiana title. Half my brain says
Yeah floor shift, the other half says dont
Butcher a nice original car.
Comment
-
Originally posted by 50pete View PostMy question is why? Maybe to fit more people in the front seat? I think the floor shift is more comfortable, i have 56 power hawk thats 3 on the tree
I"d like to convert it but dont want to cut a hole in the floor, it"s a pretty nice 1 owner car with 54k on it. Even have the
Original indiana title. Half my brain says
Yeah floor shift, the other half says dont
Butcher a nice original car.
Bob
Comment
-
Originally posted by 50pete View PostMy question is why? Maybe to fit more people in the front seat?
Craig
Comment
-
Originally posted by 8E45E View PostThat was exactly why. In order to make it more comfortable for the middle front seat passenger which was a rather important selling feature back in the day when people usually had large families.
CraigGary L.
Wappinger, NY
SDC member since 1968
Studebaker enthusiast much longer
Comment
-
As already stated, more room for three in the front seat. Bucket seats and a console really changed the dynamics of a family car. By the way, Studebaker went all in in 1939, to the extent that in an effort to flatten out the trans hump, the turned the transmission in the President and Commander, on it's side. Someone wanting to return 39 back to what it was like in 1938, would be in for a hell of a job!
Comment
Comment