Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

2nd Excalibur Built - Paxton Supercharged

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • 2nd Excalibur Built - Paxton Supercharged

    Would you yank the Chevy engine?


  • #2
    Cool! I dig the Mercedes connection.
    Diesel loving, autocrossing, Coupe express loving, Grandpa Architect.

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by StudeMichael View Post
      I hear you,...but no I wouldn't.

      Comment


      • #4
        Really neat car with lots of provenance. (Noticed that the passenger side traction bar is missing.)

        The comparison with the Cobra (weight versus horsepower) was very interesting, this thing must have seemed like a rocket ship in 1965.
        Paul
        Winston-Salem, NC
        Visit The Studebaker Skytop Registry website at: www.studebakerskytop.com
        Check out my YouTube channel here: https://www.youtube.com/user/r1lark

        Comment


        • #5
          The 327 should be the original engine in a early Excalibur.

          Comment


          • #6
            I would not deviate from the factory spec unless it was a minor deviation which improved drivablity or safety....such as a dual master cylinder.
            Diesel loving, autocrossing, Coupe express loving, Grandpa Architect.

            Comment


            • #7
              I would leave it as is.

              Craig

              Comment


              • #8
                Was the prototype car #1? I think the prototype was the only car to feature a Studebaker 289 supercharged engine. Perhaps this is why the early 327 supercharged. Does this vehicle still exist?
                Last edited by Devan; 07-31-2016, 09:47 AM.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Way cool. Will be interesting to see what it brings.

                  jack vines
                  PackardV8

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    The Studebaker SS had the 289.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by Devan View Post
                      Was the prototype car #1? I think the prototype was the only car to feature a Studebaker 289 supercharged engine. Perhaps this is why the early 327 supercharged. Does this vehicle still exist?
                      It was a Studebaker 'SS' before Brooks Stevens set up his own stand at the 1964 Auto Show. More info here: http://forum.studebakerdriversclub.c...ight=excalibur

                      Craig

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Very cool car, especially 50+ years after the fact, however, I've always found it hard to believe that Brooks Stevens really thought that he might have a 'snowballs chance in hell' Studebaker management would consider buying into something as radical as that......For starters, their 'normal' auto production was hanging by a thread at that critical time!

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Doesn't this car use a Stude Lark Convertible chassis like the Avanti?

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by sgriggs View Post
                            Doesn't this car use a Stude Lark Convertible chassis like the Avanti?
                            Yes, all of the first series (1964-1969) models used the Studebaker frame.
                            Gary L.
                            Wappinger, NY

                            SDC member since 1968
                            Studebaker enthusiast much longer

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by SN-60 View Post
                              Very cool car, especially 50+ years after the fact, however, I've always found it hard to believe that Brooks Stevens really thought that he might have a 'snowballs chance in hell' Studebaker management would consider buying into something as radical as that......For starters, their 'normal' auto production was hanging by a thread at that critical time!
                              The Excaibur was Sherwood Egbert's idea, Brooks was just doing what he was hired to do.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X