Instead of asking this in a private message, I decided to ask this on the forum, since the answers might be of interest to others. As we all know, the major car companies used to give Canadian built models completely different names from their US counterparts. (Do they still?) I do not think Studebaker ever did this. As they were all built in Canada in 1965-66 it is a moot point, but for earlier years why didn't Studebaker follow what the other companies were doing? Cost, or just a different philosophy? Why did the other companies think it was such a necessary part of their Canadian marketing? Would Studebaker have done any better following their example in Canada? In 1965-66 was there any thought given to new names for US vs. Canadian models (I would guess not, since there was so little money for advertising as it was)?
The strange thing to me is that if you look at the marketing of the big three in Canada you would almost assume there was a RULE that Canadian cars have different names. Were there (are there) legal reasons for this? Studebaker had some minor hardware (steering wheel, etc.) differences, but it stopped there.
It's funny to imagine the Canadian version of the President - the Prime Minister!
The strange thing to me is that if you look at the marketing of the big three in Canada you would almost assume there was a RULE that Canadian cars have different names. Were there (are there) legal reasons for this? Studebaker had some minor hardware (steering wheel, etc.) differences, but it stopped there.
It's funny to imagine the Canadian version of the President - the Prime Minister!
Comment