Got around to thinking about changing oil in my '65 Cruiser and looked up filter in several popular stores and they all come up with Fram CH200PL or WIX 51143, both cartridge types which bolt onto right side of engine, accessible from top of engine. Since I did not see this cartridge container in that place, I looked under the car, and lo and behold, the spin-on cartridge was mounted on the left rear of the engine. It was a Fram, but rotated so I could not read the number. Which made me wonder: What kind of Chebby engine was in my Cruiser? And what is the proper number for the filter? It would be a lot more simple to know this before loosening and removing the filter, which always is somewhat messy. And what kind of oil would YOU use? (I know, this might lead to a lot more comments.) Photo attached. Thanks.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Oil filter in Chebby Baker (not 283 McKinnon?)
Collapse
X
-
It has probably been converted to a spin on filter somewhere along the line. Or it may have a later block. All Studebaker installed 283 engines had the cartridge type filter on the drivers side. Only original looking thing I see on the engine is the exhaust manifolds.Frank van Doorn
Omaha, Ne.
1962 GT Hawk 289 4 speed
1941 Champion streetrod, R-2 Powered, GM 200-4R trans.
1952 V-8 232 Commander State "Starliner" hardtop OD
-
HTIH (Hope The Info Helps)
Jeff
Get your facts first, and then you can distort them as much as you please. Mark Twain
Note: SDC# 070190 (and earlier...)
Comment
-
Originally posted by DEEPNHOCK View PostHere you go.....
Get a Fram p/n# K98ADP (filter adapter kit) to upgrade from a cannister oil filter on a McKinnon V8 to convert to a spin on oil filter.
Then.....
Get a Fram PH373 "Long" spin on oil filter... (Holds extra oil)
[ATTACH=CONFIG]36823[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=CONFIG]36824[/ATTACH]sigpic
Jack, in Montana
Comment
-
Moron filters
Originally posted by rodnutrandy View PostWix 51069 or napa 1069 for short filterOriginally posted by swvalcon View PostOn the Lt rear of the block there is a raised casting number next to the bell houshing. This number will also tell you if it's a 283,327,350 or what.
Last edited by jnfweber; 08-06-2014, 02:21 PM.sigpic
Jack, in Montana
Comment
-
Copper would not be my choice if I was going to jury rig linkage. Somebody was lucky the linkage didn't fail at a critical moment. The proper piece shouldn't be too had to find."In the heart of Arkansas."
Searcy, Arkansas
1952 Commander 2 door. Really fine 259.
1952 2R pickup
Comment
-
I refuse to use half of an Oil filter and it's Oil capacity, when a Whole one is available.
The GM 283 with spin-on conversion "should take" a Full Size NAPA Pro Select # 21069 or NAPA "Gold" (WIX) equivalent FIL 1069 for a '65 Chevelle 283.StudeRich
Second Generation Stude Driver,
Proud '54 Starliner Owner
SDC Member Since 1967
Comment
-
Wix is not a better filter than Fram.
Originally posted by jnfweber View PostThanks ebberybody, that saves me a bunch of looking up. I think Fram PH11 or PH10575 would also work. I have Pennzoil equivalent (PZ-18A) of a WIX 51372 as an added partial flow add-on on my Sky Hawk. Do any of you all know the taller WIX equivalent? I have been told WIX is a better filter than Fram, at least their "gold" series. While on the subject (photos of rusty engine), do you know where I could get a NOS or good used throtal link to replace the copper wire. Yes, I know the air filter can should be black, but at the time I was "taken" by the gold color from the Speedster.
HTIH (Hope The Info Helps)
Jeff
Get your facts first, and then you can distort them as much as you please. Mark Twain
Note: SDC# 070190 (and earlier...)
Comment
-
Originally posted by StudeRich View PostI refuse to use half of an Oil filter and it's Oil capacity, when a Whole one is available.
The GM 283 with spin-on conversion "should take" a Full Size NAPA Pro Select # 21069 or NAPA "Gold" (WIX) equivalent FIL 1069 for a '65 Chevelle 283.sigpic
Jack, in Montana
Comment
-
Let's be clear and accurate about this.
The three lengths of filters for a GM V8 engine are determined by the engine/vehicle manufacturer for that specific application.
It's not a cost cutting, or corner cutting decision.
It may well be a space, or packaging, decision.
And there may well be a filtration media difference between the three lengths of filters.
Meaning the filtration capabilities should all be equal between the three (or more) length of filters.
So, it the only difference is the oil capacity of the filter, then I would opt for the added capacity just to help with heat exchange, and with extending the service interval by slowing the contamination rate (due to more lubricant there to contaminate).
And... All of the filter manufacturers build good products.
Brand preference is almost always a marketing function, and rarely is it a performance function.
If a company (Fram Group) that builds 2.75 million filters a week made bad filters, they wouldn't be in business very long.
As a side note... Wix (parent company Affinia) is up for sale right now...so if you want to get into the filter biz.......
Originally Posted by StudeRich
I refuse to use half of an Oil filter and it's Oil capacity, when a Whole one is available.
The GM 283 with spin-on conversion "should take" a Full Size NAPA Pro Select # 21069 or NAPA "Gold" (WIX) equivalent FIL 1069 for a '65 Chevelle 283.
Yeah, I agree. That is why I added the post. Thanks.HTIH (Hope The Info Helps)
Jeff
Get your facts first, and then you can distort them as much as you please. Mark Twain
Note: SDC# 070190 (and earlier...)
Comment
Comment