1964 Daytona convertible on Hemmings

[David Daoust]

Claims 13,000 original miles. Lots of pictures. Still though...price seems high.

http://www.hemmings.com/classifieds/dealer/studebaker/daytona/1658959.html

[StudeRich]

If it is a near perfect Car, it would have to be this one:

http://forum.studebakerdriversclub.com/showthread.php?81888-Beautiful-but-pricey-1964-Convertible-online-Can-it-be-as-original-perfect-as-described&highlight=daytona+Convertible

[62champ]

Funny how that small amount of paint missing on the full wheel covers make them look so much different...

[StudeRich]

It does give them a different look, it made me question whether the Black Center was correct! I thought wait a minute, was the "S" Black and the circle Stainless or what? Then I realized someone had just polished the Black off of the outer part.

If he would take $25000.00, I could repaint those Wheelcovers!

[David Daoust]

For that kind of money I'd part with my Andy Granatelli-owned 64 Daytona convertible!

[StudeRich]

Speaking of nitpicky little things that are wrong, what did you do to the Wheels you have on Russ's former Car? Chrysler or Ford maybe? They do not have enough backset.

Notice how the original Car has it's tires way more inside the wheel wells like they should be to not overstress the Wheel Bearings and Look correct.

[David Daoust]

They're on car. Just put the wheel covers over them.

[StudeRich]

Well then, I guess he made a bad choice of wheels for that Car then, as they are not even close to the original backset.

[EssexExport]

Beautiful car. Not so beautiful price.