Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Another old (Lark) wives tale?
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by skyway View Postbut this is a new one to me.
Anybody know if its true or where it came from?
Ironically, I was perusing the local delicatessen just this morning and noted some new varieties of BALONEY myself. BP
We've got to quit saying, "How stupid can you be?" Too many people are taking it as a challenge.
G. K. Chesterton: This triangle of truisms, of father, mother, and child, cannot be destroyed; it can only destroy those civilizations which disregard it.
-
I wonder if some GM dealers added a Stude franchise to sell the compacts and it had nothing to do with GM itself. I can't imagine GM would allow that but maybe they had less control in 1958.Don Wilson, Centralia, WA
40 Champion 4 door*
50 Champion 2 door*
53 Commander K Auto*
53 Commander K overdrive*
55 President Speedster
62 GT 4Speed*
63 Avanti R1*
64 Champ 1/2 ton
* Formerly owned
Comment
-
Milt
1947 Champion (owned since 1967)
1961 Hawk 4-speed
1967 Avanti
1961 Lark 2 door
1988 Avanti Convertible
Member of SDC since 1973
Comment
-
Originally posted by ddub View PostI wonder if some GM dealers added a Stude franchise to sell the compacts and it had nothing to do with GM itself.
Craig
Comment
-
Originally posted by ddub View PostI wonder if some GM dealers added a Stude franchise to sell the compacts and it had nothing to do with GM itself. I can't imagine GM would allow that but maybe they had less control in 1958.
So there were many reasons for B-O-P dealers to seek a Studebaker franchise for 1959, and Studebaker was more than happy to accommodate them. Of course, that would prove to be a liability from 1961 forward, when those same dealers couldn't care less about Studebakers, now that they had their own to sell and GM likely discouraged their stocking Studebakers anyway.
The bottom line is thatwe should not kid ourselves;the marketing people at General Motors knew it was only a matter of time for Studebaker anyway, so they likely had little interest in what Studebaker was doing or marketing, except to confirm their suspicions (with Rambler sales going through the roof), that they [GM] had better get on the ball and offer something "compact" for their dealers going forward from 1960. BPWe've got to quit saying, "How stupid can you be?" Too many people are taking it as a challenge.
G. K. Chesterton: This triangle of truisms, of father, mother, and child, cannot be destroyed; it can only destroy those civilizations which disregard it.
Comment
-
Originally posted by BobPalma View PostThat's correct, Don. Especially Buick-Olds-Pontiac dealers in the fall of 1958. They had just come off a disastrous 1958 model year and they knew Studebaker would have a new compact car for 1959 and they also likely knew GM wouldn't have "intermediate" compacts for at least two more model years, even though Chevrolet would have a compact for 1960.
So there were many reasons for B-O-P dealers to seek a Studebaker franchise for 1959, and Studebaker was more than happy to accommodate them. Of course, that would prove to be a liability from 1961 forward, when those same dealers couldn't care less about Studebakers, now that they had their own to sell and GM likely discouraged their stocking Studebakers anyway.
The bottom line is thatwe should not kid ourselves;the marketing people at General Motors knew it was only a matter of time for Studebaker anyway, so they likely had little interest in what Studebaker was doing or marketing, except to confirm their suspicions (with Rambler sales going through the roof), that they [GM] had better get on the ball and offer something "compact" for their dealers going forward from 1960. BPPaul Johnson, Wild and Wonderful West Virginia.
'64 Daytona Wagonaire, '64 Avanti R-1, Museum R-4 engine, '72 Gravely Model 430 with Onan engine
Comment
-
Growing up in Pitman New Jersey in the 1950's and 1960's we had a large and successful Pontiac dealer who sold in addition to Pontiac,
Kaiser Jeep, and Studebaker . John S. Stratton ,I know he sold quite a few Larks and Studebaker trucks. The farmers liked the trucks and for some reason quite a few of my school teachers drove Larks. I guess because of the purchase price and low operating cost. Teachers weren't paid very well back in the day.
Oh one more thing, he did drop Studebaker when that first Tempest came out. You know the one with half a V8 in front connected by a flexible driveshaft to the transmission in the rear. What were the GM engineers smoking when they thought that up.Last edited by 57pack; 03-25-2014, 12:26 PM.sigpic1957 Packard Clipper Country Sedan
"There's nothing stronger than the heart of a volunteer"
Lt. Col. Jimmy Doolittle
"I have a great memory for forgetting things" Number 1 son, Lee Chan
Comment
-
Originally posted by 52hawk View PostMy father bought his new '62 Lark wagon from Lambert Jones in LaSalle,Il. Lambert was also a Cadillac dealer.
Then in the '60s I was talking to one of the Anderson Brothers in Garnett, KS and he told me that he didn't think Studebaker would be around too much longer so they took on a Ford franchise in '61 and kept on selling Studebakers along with Fords. They were a major small town dealer and sold a lot of Studebakers from the wagon era through '66. In fact, their claim was that there were more Studebaker truck registered in their county than all other trucks combined. He also told me that they had a lot higher prep cost and warranty cost on the Fords that they did with Studebakers.Paul Johnson, Wild and Wonderful West Virginia.
'64 Daytona Wagonaire, '64 Avanti R-1, Museum R-4 engine, '72 Gravely Model 430 with Onan engine
Comment
Comment