OK, I know that for many of you, discussing 6 cylinder Studebaker engines is about as popular as your next tooth ache, but bare with me. If I am understanding my Truck Shop Manual that covers trucks from 1949 to 1956 (not a reprint), this particular engine is a 1954. It is the last year of the 169.6 (170) engines.
I got it from a man who removed it from a 1955 truck he and his son were rodding. While looking in the shop manual to identify this engine, I see the column for H.P. is labeled H.P. Rating. Under that rating it list both the 169.6 and the new 185 engines as having the same H.P. rating. Also, if this stuff isn't confusing enough already...the Studebaker manual list the Horse Power Rating at 26! How's that for suppressing your tendency to brag about how powerful your motor is.
In another vintage book I have (Automotive Encyclopedia) it gives the H.P. of the 169.6 as 85 H.P. @4000RPM and the 185 engine as having 101 H.P. @4000 RPM. The main difference I see in the two engines is an additional 3/8" in the stroke. All other specs seem to stay the same including compression ratio. Seems like a lot of additional H.P. for such a tiny measurement of stroke. These are the kind of things that fascinate number and mathematical challenged minds like mine.
I got it from a man who removed it from a 1955 truck he and his son were rodding. While looking in the shop manual to identify this engine, I see the column for H.P. is labeled H.P. Rating. Under that rating it list both the 169.6 and the new 185 engines as having the same H.P. rating. Also, if this stuff isn't confusing enough already...the Studebaker manual list the Horse Power Rating at 26! How's that for suppressing your tendency to brag about how powerful your motor is.
In another vintage book I have (Automotive Encyclopedia) it gives the H.P. of the 169.6 as 85 H.P. @4000RPM and the 185 engine as having 101 H.P. @4000 RPM. The main difference I see in the two engines is an additional 3/8" in the stroke. All other specs seem to stay the same including compression ratio. Seems like a lot of additional H.P. for such a tiny measurement of stroke. These are the kind of things that fascinate number and mathematical challenged minds like mine.
Comment