Nicely done. Even if you are a purist you will appreciate this one.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
40 Stude Street Rod
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Studebaker Wheel View PostI am a bit of a purist and I don't find this car a bit appealing. A 1939-40 Commander front clip grafted to a 1941-46 Champion body. In their original form any one of them looked far superior to this conglomeration.
Comment
-
Originally posted by jnfweber View PostI think it would look a lot better if the lower body were channeled. It looks far too fat for my taste.
Did you mean sectioned? Or chopped? In either case I'd have to respectfully disagree. I think the builder pretty much nailed it.~Matt Connor
'59 Lark 2-door
Comment
-
I do not object to all modifieds. Not many people know that I once had a 1941 Champion 4 dr into which I installed a 426 c.i. wedge head Chrysler. This was about 1965. I simply do not believe that the car you referenced is tastefully done. I am attaching two photos of a '40 Champion that, I believe, is tastefully done. Note that the character of the car is maintained by the preservation of the mouldings and other bright work. Also it has a nice "stance" unlike the radically lowered version in the referenced car.
Richard Quinn
Editor emeritus: Antique Studebaker Review
Comment
-
I like them both, the workmanship on the Ebay car is pretty spectacular. I do like the lowered stance, I'm sure it is air suspension and can be adjusted. To each their own.
PatPat Dilling
Olivehurst, CA
Custom '53 Starlight aka STU COOL
LS1 Engine Swap Journal: http://www.hotrodders.com/forum/jour...ournalid=33611
Comment
-
I could live with the blue car except for the "Donk" wheels. Makes it look like a matchbox racer. The red 40 champion is nice. I like the restorod look. Leave the car alone and make it run and handle like a new car with all the bells and whistles. We used to call them sleepers. I wouldn't cut up an original car if it were restorable, but if given a basket of crap and you can make it look nice and run well, I applaud you.sigpic1966 Daytona (The First One)
1950 Champion Convertible
1950 Champion 4Dr
1955 President 2 Dr Hardtop
1957 Thunderbird
Comment
-
Originally posted by plwindish View PostThat 41 must have been a real shocker to cars trying to pass you. I imagine a 426 in that car had some get up and go.
Richard Quinn
Editor emeritus: Antique Studebaker Review
Comment
-
Don't like the choice on the headlights, or the skinny sneakers. Other than that...well executed.Brad Johnson,
SDC since 1975, ASC since 1990
Pine Grove Mills, Pa.
'33 Rockne 10, '51 Commander Starlight. '53 Commander Starlight
'56 Sky Hawk in process
Comment
-
I agree with Richard, I do not like the stance, the lack of brightwork, and especially the wheels and tires. However I do like the interior. It is obvious a great deal of money and work are in this, most of it wasted in my opinion.
Comment
-
Exept for the super-silly-ugly wheels I find it okidoki, maby a little bit to low but... but... that RED one! ...or even more Richard's 413-powered 4-door!!!
I remember in the 70's when (around Stockholm at least) everybody thought (me too as I didn't know better) that 413 were crap engines 'cause there was all those Hemi's around...
Well, I learned later on.
Maaan how you could rev those 413's if you did a very few things to them...
.
Comment
Comment