As a rule, at Studebaker events, are there less 61 Larks (four door, Deluxes), six cylinder, automatic cars compared to other Larks? It seems most Larks out there are V8's. Just wondering.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Observation/Opinion
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by drnittler View PostAs a rule, at Studebaker events, are there less 61 Larks (four door, Deluxes), six cylinder, automatic cars compared to other Larks? It seems most Larks out there are V8's. Just wondering.Chip
'63 Cruiser
'57 Packard wagon
'61 Lark Regal 4 dr wagon
'50 Commander 4 dr sedan
-
Also consider that the V8s can travel the roads better to go to these meets than the 6s can.sigpic
Home of the Fried Green Tomato
"IF YOU WANT THE SMILES YOU NEED TO DO THE MILES "
1960 Champ , 1966 Daytona , 1965 Daytona Wagonaire
Comment
-
In 1961, the first year for the OHV Six, Lark production (From the Standard Catalog of American Cars) added up by model and broken down by engine is as follows:
Sixes - 41,072
Eights - 25,513
1960, the year of my Lark, and the last year for the Flathead Six, things went like this:
Sixes - 65,013
Eights - 57,173
Pretty clear that across all models, dealers probably stocked more sixes for the price advantage. The OHV Six in '61 increased the six cylinder's share of the business pretty notably.
On survival rates today, there's no doubt more eights were probably pampered. I've also seen some six cylinder cars changed to eights by owners.
Makes sense. In 1960 with the flathead, my Six Cylinder Convertible gets the same mileage as a V8, and doesn't have the performance the V8 has. We don't race or do hill climbs with our Lark, so the six serves us well. Might have a different opinion if I lived in a big city or around mountains. The V8 convertible outsold the Six convertible in 1960 (5,464 V8 to 3,107 Sixes). In 1961, it was pretty close to half and half (1,002 V8 to 979 Sixes).
I've never owned one, but the OHV Six definitely made the six a little more attractive to some.
Comment
-
One would also wonder how many OHV six cars were junked because of cracked heads back when they were just used cars."In the heart of Arkansas."
Searcy, Arkansas
1952 Commander 2 door. Really fine 259.
1952 2R pickup
Comment
-
Production figures are a place to start. Survival rates today depend on whether someone in the past decided to pamper the car.
No doubt, a V8 car is more attractive than the sixes. And, as it was said above, Studebaker had problems with the OHV Six launch out of the gate.
It's just like Chevy Novas. My parents and my grandparents both had ones with "250" (six cylinder) above the front sidemarker lights. Those "250" plates were more the rule than the exception back in the '70's. Today, looking at Preserved and Restored Novas, you'd think you could only buy a "350" Nova back in the day!
Comment
-
This is typical of most cars from the 50's-70's. As a rule the 6's outside the 8's and 4-doors outsold 2-doors, but most people in this hobby prefer the V-8's and the 2-doors so more of them are saved.Last edited by irish; 02-06-2012, 07:39 AM.sigpic
1962 Daytona
1964 Cruiser
And a few others
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by irish View PostJust by owning a Studebaker you have a car less seen than others!Joe
My opinion is that I want to promote Studebakers every way I can, so I want to be seen driving the best looking, top of the line models with the most Stock power and nice sounding duals that I can afford.
So that is why I don't own a Scotsman or want bottom of the line models, or care much about driving the 2 "6" Cyl. Vehicles out of 20 or so V-8's I have.
StudeRich
Second Generation Stude Driver,
Proud '54 Starliner Owner
SDC Member Since 1967
Comment
-
The Stude Eight was a much better motor than the OHV Six from what I've read and heard. Even Consumer Reports in the early 1960's implicitly stated that a 259 was the better choice: not only was it much more powerful than the Six, it returned better MPG, at least on the highway due to much lower numeric gears.--------------------------------------
Sold my 1962; Studeless at the moment
Borrowed Bams50's sigline here:
"Do they all not, by mere virtue of having survived as relics of a bygone era, amass a level of respect perhaps not accorded to them when they were new?"
Comment
Comment