The thread about Nimesh's Avanti, especially Biggs' comments in post #13 have gotten me thinking about my own over-the-top project I've been planning; and would love to hear your thoughts on it, big-picture.
It's a '62 Daytona 2dr. HT with Skytop, R2/5 speed. My favorite Studebakers are Larks; my favorite year is '62; my favorite '62 Lark is the 2dr. HT; the ultimate Stude engine is the R2; and my favorite accessory is the Skytop. My goals are to build the car I want, exactly as I want it; assure that every inch has been refreshed for dependability reasons; and, to build it to the highest level I can, to see what I can really do. Reality of the times have put the project on hold, but I have the engine complete and done, solid CO body shell, Skytop roof, lots of NOS like fenders, hood, trunk, grille, lights, etc. etc. The plan has been to gather the pieces as they come along, then when times get better start the build.
Seeing Nimesh's car got me thinking. I thought about buying a Super Lark needing restoration and doing a correct stock restoration, but then I thought about upgrades I'd want- 5-speed, modern wiring system with power windows, later disc brakes, better power steering; and, I prefer the '62 body style, and Studebaker never built a '62 R2 Lark. So my plan made sense to me: Build just what I want, without worry of an inaccurate restoration. I have enjoyed the process of thinking, planning, gathering parts, etc. even though I cannot yet start the build.
Now I'm wondering if I should do this build at all. I won't be spending as much as Nimesh did, but it will still be substantial. The plan was body-off, since I wanted a top-quality car that would look stock but I could feel confident to jump in and drive cross-country if I wanted. But I realize Larks aren't the most popular car, plus '62s are less desirable.
That normally wouldn't matter, but my track record has been to have a car a few years then sell it and try something else. For a keeper it wouldn't matter, but for a guy that might want to sell, it's an issue. It would make more sense to put that kind of work and money into a more valuable car, and do it stock- worth more at sale time. Somebody like Nimesh can afford to lose tens of thousands of dollars and give away thousands of hours of skilled labor at sale time, but I cannot. I could do a lesser build, body-on, etc. and still have a very nice car, but that's not what I wanted to do.
So, we're just exploring here: What you do? Build as planned, cost/hours be damned? Nice car a level or two down? Scrap and build a valuable car?
Comments from everyone from newbies to BTDT guys appreciated.
It's a '62 Daytona 2dr. HT with Skytop, R2/5 speed. My favorite Studebakers are Larks; my favorite year is '62; my favorite '62 Lark is the 2dr. HT; the ultimate Stude engine is the R2; and my favorite accessory is the Skytop. My goals are to build the car I want, exactly as I want it; assure that every inch has been refreshed for dependability reasons; and, to build it to the highest level I can, to see what I can really do. Reality of the times have put the project on hold, but I have the engine complete and done, solid CO body shell, Skytop roof, lots of NOS like fenders, hood, trunk, grille, lights, etc. etc. The plan has been to gather the pieces as they come along, then when times get better start the build.
Seeing Nimesh's car got me thinking. I thought about buying a Super Lark needing restoration and doing a correct stock restoration, but then I thought about upgrades I'd want- 5-speed, modern wiring system with power windows, later disc brakes, better power steering; and, I prefer the '62 body style, and Studebaker never built a '62 R2 Lark. So my plan made sense to me: Build just what I want, without worry of an inaccurate restoration. I have enjoyed the process of thinking, planning, gathering parts, etc. even though I cannot yet start the build.
Now I'm wondering if I should do this build at all. I won't be spending as much as Nimesh did, but it will still be substantial. The plan was body-off, since I wanted a top-quality car that would look stock but I could feel confident to jump in and drive cross-country if I wanted. But I realize Larks aren't the most popular car, plus '62s are less desirable.
That normally wouldn't matter, but my track record has been to have a car a few years then sell it and try something else. For a keeper it wouldn't matter, but for a guy that might want to sell, it's an issue. It would make more sense to put that kind of work and money into a more valuable car, and do it stock- worth more at sale time. Somebody like Nimesh can afford to lose tens of thousands of dollars and give away thousands of hours of skilled labor at sale time, but I cannot. I could do a lesser build, body-on, etc. and still have a very nice car, but that's not what I wanted to do.
So, we're just exploring here: What you do? Build as planned, cost/hours be damned? Nice car a level or two down? Scrap and build a valuable car?
Comments from everyone from newbies to BTDT guys appreciated.
Comment