If you think Studebaker are under valued, how about this $5300 Rambler Rebel convert that showed up at my house today t0 buy seat covers. (ebay purchase)
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Ophan prices
Collapse
X
-
Wow! I am not an AMC fan, partly based on my father-in-law's experiences with new purchases of them. Seeing this car at that price, I guess that most people see them as I do, but it only takes two to make an auction. I would have guessed it at $7500-$9500. Maybe the low end since it obviously needs interior. I think that the dearth of parts is part of the value problem.Gary L.
Wappinger, NY
SDC member since 1968
Studebaker enthusiast much longer
-
Well, it is a 1967. A 1968, last year of AMC convertible production (forget the Alliance), would bring more money.
Still, a bargain of "collectible driving" at $5,300. BPWe've got to quit saying, "How stupid can you be?" Too many people are taking it as a challenge.
G. K. Chesterton: This triangle of truisms, of father, mother, and child, cannot be destroyed; it can only destroy those civilizations which disregard it.
Comment
-
Originally posted by studegary View PostWow! I am not an AMC fan, partly based on my father-in-law's experiences with new purchases of them. Seeing this car at that price, I guess that most people see them as I do, but it only takes two to make an auction. I would have guessed it at $7500-$9500. Maybe the low end since it obviously needs interior. I think that the dearth of parts is part of the value problem.JDP Maryland
Comment
-
Besides being a convertible, those late '60s AMCs were really great cars. I owned the coupe version of that with the 290" V8 and it was a great driving car. The true unibody made it the stiffest platform of anything of its' day. By comparision, the big three were flexi-flyers.
jack vinesPackardV8
Comment
-
I'm with you, I would not change that interior. I also would have been sorely tempted had someone pointed out that car to me at that price. Like I need another car.
nate--
55 Commander Starlight
http://members.cox.net/njnagel
Comment
-
I think that the dearth of parts is part of the value problem.[/QUOTE]
I think that is why I let my Javelin go. Parts were getting harder to find and the prices were crazy.Jamie McLeod
Hope Mills, NC
1963 Lark "Ugly Betty"
1958 Commander "Christine"
1964 Wagonaire "Louise"
1955 Commander Sedan
1964 Champ
1960 Lark
Comment
-
How long do you think until prices start increasing on collector cars?
Just as houses prices in Spokane, WA never inflated as high as in many metro areas of CA, FL, AZ, NV, they haven't crashed as deeply. Studebakers have never had any real value in the collector market, thus they haven't fallen as much either. Since they've never gone up, it is probably safe to say they'll never go up substantially faster than inflation. Your results may vary.
jack vinesPackardV8
Comment
-
Originally posted by PackardV8 View PostBesides being a convertible, those late '60s AMCs were really great cars. I owned the coupe version of that with the 290" V8 and it was a great driving car. The true unibody made it the stiffest platform of anything of its' day. By comparision, the big three were flexi-flyers.
jack vinesGary L.
Wappinger, NY
SDC member since 1968
Studebaker enthusiast much longer
Comment
-
Originally posted by studegary View PostIn the late-1960s, I purchased and drove many miles in Plymouth and Dodge cars. I remember them as being unibody. Is my memory slipping (or yours) <G>?
Tomsigpic
Comment
Comment