This may not be a Stude. Picture was taken in July of 1939. If it is I will reply back and tell you the story of this car. Please help identify and give as much detail as possible. Thanks. SORRY I FORGOT THE PIC. Here it is http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y45...0/File0086.jpg
-
-
I looked thru a pretty extensive collection of pix of all makes, and saw nothing quite like it. It appears much like a Chrysler product, but I could not blow it up well enough to tell.
Sam Robertsquote:Originally posted by SteveOwen620
This may not be a Stude. Picture was taken in July of 1939. If it is I will reply back and tell you the story of this car. Please help identify and give as much detail as possible. Thanks. SORRY I FORGOT THE PIC. Here it is http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y45...0/File0086.jpg
-
It's a 1939 Ford sedan - definitely not a Studebaker.The only difference between death and taxes is that death does not grow worse every time Congress convenes. - Will RogersComment
-
Your right Chris, either a 1939 Standard, or a 1938 Deluxe sedan. I should have caught on, my oldest brother was restoring a 1939 Standard when he died! [:I][B)]
Sam Robertsquote:Originally posted by Chris Pile
It's a 1939 Ford sedan - definitely not a Studebaker.Comment
-
I agree with Sam. It's definately a '38 Ford.
Rog'59 Lark VI Regal Hardtop
Smithtown,NY
Recording Secretary, Long Island Studebaker ClubComment
-
From what I have been told, there is little difference from a 1938 Deluxe, to a 1939 Standard in looks.
Sam Robertsquote:Originally posted by studeroger
I agree with Sam. It's definately a '38 Ford.
RogComment
Comment