64 Wagon

[Transtar56]

I don't care for the wheels,but sure looks like a nice Wagonaire

http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&category=6466&item=4554641175

[her63]

I agree. I'm not sure WHAT somebody was thinking when they chose those rims. They are definitely not that car. It does look like a nice ride though.

[65cruiser]

Those wheels belong on a tuner car.

________________________
Mark Anderson

http://home.alltel.net/anderm

1965 Studebaker Cruiser

[N8N]

there was a '53 or '54 Starlight at SB with those rims, I thought they actually looked pretty good on that car. I think those are supposed to be lightweight rims for drag racing. As for the Starlight, I am guessing it was Chevy powered from the exhaust note but never got to see under the hood. It was very nicely done with some subtle custom graphics and a Hawk dash with a bead blasted aluminum face. I really liked the overall look of that car.

nate

--
55 Commander Starlight
62 Daytona hardtop

http://home.comcast.net/~njnagel

[studeclunker]

Nice looking wagon. Looks like one I have. Except the paint is better... and the upholstry... probably the engine...
Nice thing about those wheels is that NOS wheels and hubcaps are readily avialable.

Lotsa Larks!
Studeclunker
A.K.A: out2lunch

[65cruiser]

Don't get me wrong, I like wheels as much as the next guy, but I think they should be "period correct".

If you're gonna go that route[]

________________________
Mark Anderson

http://home.alltel.net/anderm

1965 Studebaker Cruiser

[Swifster]

I would agree. A nice set of Cragar S/S or American Torque Thrusts would look better .

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tom - Sterling Heights, MI

Ancient Chinese Proverb: "Injection is nice, but I'd rather be blown!"

1964 Studebaker Daytona - Laguna Blue, Original 4-Spd. Car, Power Steering, Disc Brakes, Bucket Seats, Tinted Glass, Climatizer Ventilation System, AM Radio (136,989 Miles)

[Thecarphotoguy1]

My wife's 64 Wagonaire cost a lot more but isn't as nice. I'm thinking of pulling the 259 V8, 3-speed & rear to install something like a stock 5.4 Lightning or FI 502 Chevy that will allow her power steering (will likely have to put a Mustang II front end on it), brakes, & either an automatic or 5-sp. Probably go with a 9" Ford rear to hold the power & torque. Might be easier to just pop the body on a late model Ford or S-10 Frame. Ever hear of anyone doing that?

[65cruiser]

Oh God, here we go....[V]

________________________
Mark Anderson

http://home.alltel.net/anderm

1965 Studebaker Cruiser

[jackb]

In the immortal words of Uncle Fred: "Hey...do your own thing, it's your car "

[Studedude]

quote:Originally posted by Thecarphotoguy1

My wife's 64 Wagonaire cost a lot more but isn't as nice. I'm thinking of pulling the 259 V8, 3-speed & rear to install something like a stock 5.4 Lightning or FI 502 Chevy that will allow her power steering (will likely have to put a Mustang II front end on it), brakes, & either an automatic or 5-sp. Probably go with a 9" Ford rear to hold the power & torque. Might be easier to just pop the body on a late model Ford or S-10 Frame. Ever hear of anyone doing that?

[B)]

Dave's Place
Studebaker Emporium

https://www.davesplaceinc.com

[Sam Roberts]

Now, explain the old bait & switch to me one more time.....................

quote:Originally posted by Thecarphotoguy1

My wife's 64 Wagonaire cost a lot more but isn't as nice. I'm thinking of pulling the 259 V8, 3-speed & rear to install something like a stock 5.4 Lightning or FI 502 Chevy that will allow her power steering (will likely have to put a Mustang II front end on it), brakes, & either an automatic or 5-sp. Probably go with a 9" Ford rear to hold the power & torque. Might be easier to just pop the body on a late model Ford or S-10 Frame. Ever hear of anyone doing that?

Sam Roberts

[52hawk]

Actually,this is probably the guy with the 57 Silver Hawk on e-bay,just trying to get back at us for making fun of his Hawk!

not golden hawk,not silver hawk,just hawk.

[Swifster]

quote:Originally posted by Thecarphotoguy1

My wife's 64 Wagonaire cost a lot more but isn't as nice. I'm thinking of pulling the 259 V8, 3-speed & rear to install something like a stock 5.4 Lightning or FI 502 Chevy that will allow her power steering (will likely have to put a Mustang II front end on it), brakes, & either an automatic or 5-sp. Probably go with a 9" Ford rear to hold the power & torque. Might be easier to just pop the body on a late model Ford or S-10 Frame. Ever hear of anyone doing that?

All I will say about this is that neither of these engines will fit. My Ford Ranger has a larger engine compartment than your '64 and these engines wouldn't fit my truck either. There was a reason Studebaker went with SB Chevys. If you must use a Ford, measure out a 302 or 351W (and even then 351W are taller and may not clear the hood). TCI (Total Cost Involved)can set you up with a prefab suspension kit based off Mustang II. I'd stay with the Stud frame.

And no BSing. I'm sure your wife wasn't pounding on the table for a 9" rear and 500 HP...

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tom - Sterling Heights, MI

Ancient Chinese Proverb: "Injection is nice, but I'd rather be blown!"

1964 Studebaker Daytona - Laguna Blue, Original 4-Spd. Car, Power Steering, Disc Brakes, Bucket Seats, Tinted Glass, Climatizer Ventilation System, AM Radio (136,989 Miles)