6/3 Wednesday Eye Candy

[ChampTrucking]

[wolfie]

Now we're talkin'. Steve

[showbizkid]

Yeah baby!


[img=left]http://members.cox.net/clarknovak/lark.gif[/img=left]

Clark in San Diego
'63 F2/Lark Standard

http://studeblogger.blogspot.com

https://www.studebakersandiego.com

[warrlaw1]

Nice! babe magnet...

[jclary]

LOOK MA!...NO PLASTIC! (Who is producing future classics that won't warp and melt in the hot sun?)

[Chris Pile]

Smooothness.


Chris Pile
Midway Chapter SDC
The Studebaker Special

[4961Studebaker]

SWEEEET JEEEE***

You know me, a Lark fan.....But for this one........Where's the checks dotted line for me to sign?!

ChopStu

http://www.cooks.com/rec/view/0,1927...253197,00.html ChopStu Stew

[Swifster]

That's a great looking car. But I look at those coupes the way I do going to Wrigley Field or Fenway Park (Tiger Stadium, etc.). There are too many obstructed view seats. The posts have to go. To me, the 'K' is the way! Again, that's a nice car, but a really like the Starliners better.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tom - Mulberry, FL

1964 Studebaker Daytona - 289 4V, 4-Speed (Cost To Date: $2125.60)

1964 Studebaker Commander 170-1V, 3-speed w/OD (Cost to Date: $623.67)

[silverhawk]

Sweet!

Dylan Wills

'61 lark deluxe 4 door wagon

[52-fan]

I usually don't care for the modern tires and big wheels on an old car, but those look nice. Killer stance on this one too.
I agree with the comment about the K body up to a point. I love the look of the 53 K because it is the purest form of the design, but for raciness the coupe is the way I would go. Both are great looking designs.


1952 Champion Starlight, 1962 Daytona, both w/overdrive.Searcy,Arkansas
"I may be lazy, but I'm not shiftless."